Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Diachronic Overview of the Prepositional Accusative in Portuguese

Bibliographic Data

ID5900472
AuthorsAna Regina Calindro (0000-0003-2171-5307)
Year2024
Volume9
Issue6
Pages194
Publication date2024-05-24
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages9060194
OpenAlexW4398778439
LanguageEN
References cited17

One of the several differences between Modern European Portuguese (EP) and Modern Brazilian Portuguese (BP) is the prepositional expression of complements licensed by the preposition a. While in EP the preposition a occurs in several contexts, this element has been substituted by other strategies in BP, as is extensively discussed in the literature. The aim of this paper is to investigate the historical behavior of a-marked prepositional accusatives (PP-ACC) in Portuguese. In order to do so, a search was conducted for PP-ACCs in the Historical Portuguese Corpus Tycho Brahe. The results showed an increase of PP-ACCs in the 17th century, followed by a decrease in the 18th century. Thereafter, unmarked accusatives (NP-ACC) were analyzed in the corpus, which resulted in 7756 sentences, contrasting with 624 PP-ACCs in the same contexts. This result shows that the a-marked accusative is far less common than bare accusatives in Historical Portuguese. Psych verbs, however, behaved differently, showing a constant increase in PP-ACCs. In EP, the preposition a still introduces Experiencer arguments in structures with some psych verbs (O vinho agradou ao João-lit. 'The wine pleased 'to' John'). In BP, the preposition a has disappeared in psych predicates (O vinho agradou Ø o João-'The wine pleased John'). In both Modern EP and BP, most PP-ACCs have become typical unmarked direct objects. In the context of psych verbs, however, structural accusative assignment has shifted to structural dative Case in Modern EP, so as to ascertain the interpretation of the Experiencer in the internal argument via the preposition a. While in Modern BP, the argument is not overtly marked since it receives inherent accusative case in the derivation

Linguistics · Portuguese · Computer Science · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Philosophy

  • New Analyses in Romance Linguistics

    Urbana Ill > Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Dieter Wanner et al.•New analyses in Romance linguistics•1991

  • Indefinite Objects

    Luis López•Indefinite Objects•2012

  • Elements of Grammar

    Open Access•Liliane Haegeman•Elements of Grammar•1997

  • Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance

    Susann Fischer, Christoph Gabriel•Manual of Grammatical Interfaces…•2016

  • A case for a Weak Case Contiguity hypothesis—a reply to Caha

    Open Access•Gísli Rúnar Harðarson•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016

  • Goal and DOM datives

    Open Access•M Rita Manzini, Luis Franco et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2016

  • Psych-verbs and ?-theory

    Open Access•Adriana Belletti, Laura Rizzi et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1988

  • Introduzindo argumentos

    Open Access•Ana Regina Calindro, Ana Regina Vaz Calindro•2016

  • Differential Object Marking in diachrony

    Open Access•Sonia Cyrino, Monica-Alexandrina Irimia•Revista Letras•2019

  • Análise descritiva dos verbos psicológicos do português brasileiro

    Open Access•Márcia Cançado•Revista de Estudos da Linguagem•1996

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae