Refunctionalization and Usage Frequency
An Exploratory Questionnaire Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5900570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Malte Rosemeyer (0000-0001-5348-561X, University of Freiburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 39 |
| Publication date | 2018-10-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages3040039 |
| OpenAlex | W2898430419 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 16 |
This paper explores the relationship between refunctionalization and usage frequency. In particular, it argues that (a) refunctionalization is more likely for low-frequency construction than high-frequency constructions, and that (b) high-frequency patterns are more likely candidates as models for refunctionalization processes than low-frequency patterns. It proposes that folk etymology processes be characterized as a type of refunctionalization process because in folk etymology, obsolescent and semantically void morphemes are replaced with morphemes that actually serve a function in language. This assumption allows for an empirical investigation of refunctionalization using an exploratory questionnaire study. The results indicate that usage frequency indeed plays a role in folk etymology processes, and consequently, refunctionalization. In particular, participants were more likely to accept false etymologies when the proposed etymon had a high usage frequency than when it had a low usage frequency. In summary, the present study proposes a way to study refunctionalization processes in synchrony
Etymology · Exploratory research · Linguistics · Morpheme · Natural language processing · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |