An Exploratory Study of EFL Learners' Use of ChatGPT for Language Learning Tasks
Experience and Perceptions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5900945 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yangyu Xiao (0000-0002-6698-5768, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen), Yang Zhi (0000-0003-2426-8653, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 212 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-09-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Editorial | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages8030212 |
| OpenAlex | W4386711868 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 66 |
| Referencias citadas | 12 |
ChatGPT, a general-purpose intelligent chatbot developed by OpenAI, has introduced numerous opportunities and challenges in the field of language education. With its remarkable ability to generate diverse forms of text, answer questions, and provide translations within minutes, ChatGPT has become an influential tool in the era of advanced AI technology. However, to what extent ChatGPT can be used to assist students in completing language learning tasks remains largely unexplored. Against this background, this study aimed to investigate students' experiences with ChatGPT and their perceptions of its role in language learning through a small-scale qualitative study. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews with five students at a top-tier international university in China. Students' responses revealed that ChatGPT has the potential to serve as a valuable learning partner and aid students in completing language-related tasks. Furthermore, participants exhibited critical judgment in evaluating the quality of ideas and outputs generated by ChatGPT, as well as the ability to modify prompts to maximize learning benefits. Such critical judgment offsets the potential threats to academic integrity posed by ChatGPT. Our findings contribute to the understanding of the potential of ChatGPT in language education by adding empirical evidence from students' perspectives. This study supports the idea that ChatGPT can work as an effective tool for providing students with immediate feedback and personalized learning experiences. Such findings generate implications for future pedagogical practices in the new era by providing students with personalized guidance, designing technology-embedded language support, and developing students' lifelong learning skills (e.g., autonomy and evaluative judgment) with the support of ChatGPT
Autonomy · Comprehension approach · Knowledge management · Language acquisition · Language education · Learner autonomy · Lifelong learning · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Perception · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Congenital Heart Disease Studies · Psychology
Coexisting enjoyment and boredom in AI-mediated multilingual language learning
Critical thinking in the AI era
Moods, bots, and bodies
ChatGPT use in higher education writing and its relationship with critical thinking autonomy struggle and authorship
The University Students’ Perceptions Using ChatGPT in Writing Skills
Tracking foreign language speaking enjoyment across AI-mediated conversational topics
How multimodal GenAI enhances EFL learners’ language achievement
Exploring K-3 Teachers’ Uses, Perceived Benefits, and Challenges of Generative AI in Early Writing Instruction
Exploring the affordances of large language models in translation learning
Involving AI in the development of intercultural competence
Percepción de los estudiantes universitarios sobre el uso de la Inteligencia Artificial en la producción escrita en lengua extranjera
Potentials and Challenges of Using ChatGPT in Language Learning
Factors influencing the acceptance and use of ChatGPT among English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia
Retracted Article
The role of artificial intelligence in language teacher education
Investigating the effects of AI-assisted teacher instruction on online IELTS writing
One year in the classroom with ChatGPT
How generative artificial intelligence transforms teaching and influences student wellbeing in future education
Mapping the landscape of AI-driven feedback in education
The Impact of Prompt Engineering and a Generative AI-Driven Tool on Autonomous Learning
Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language
Strategies for Integrating Generative AI into Higher Education
The Impact of ChatGPT on English for Academic Purposes (EAP) Students’ Language Learning Experience
Innovation and Design in Multilingual Education
Insights into EFL Students’ Perceptions of the ‘ChatGPT Essentials’ Training Course for Language Learning
Mental Health as a Determinant of Academic Performance among Students of Emmanuel Alayande College of Education, Oyo, Nigeria
What they provide and how
Graduate students’ use of ChatGPT for academic text revision
How teachers’ digital literacy influences the intention to use AI teaching tools
Generative AI (GenAI) in the language classroom
Unlocking EFL learners’ insights into ChatGPT use for L2 writing
The promise and limits of artificial intelligence in writing assessment and instruction
Bugbear or surefire success? Secondary school students’ conceptual learning about evolution with ChatGPT
The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement
The effects of ChatGPT on EFL students’ writing skills
How LLM Chatbots Shape Self‐Regulated Language Learning
Disclosing the Correlation Between Using ChatGPT and Well‐Being in EFL Learners
Generative AI in Technical Communication
A bibliometric analysis of the application of AI chatbots in language learning contexts
Student-AI collaboration in literacy
ChatGPT Affordances and Indonesian EFL Students’ Perceptions in L2 Writing
Artificial intelligence in applied (linguistics)
Revising for Your Lay Audience
Designing ChatGPT-mediated feedback activities in EFL writing
Generative AI in academic writing
“This dissertation intricately explores…”
Chinese EFL University Teachers’ Beliefs on Large Language Models in Language Education
Measuring Motivation for Generative AI‐based Language Learning
The effect of social media use on language learning
ChatGPT-generated versus human direct corrective feedback on L2 writing
Exploring second language writers’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback
The effects of AI-assisted feedback on students’ perceptions, emotions, and learning outcomes in L2 writing
ChatGPT for L2 learning
Enhancing reading engagement in adult EFL classrooms through AI-supported instruction
How do pre-service language teachers perceive generative AIs’ affordance
Students’ development of AI metacognitive awareness in an EAP course
Confucian Self-Cultivation and the Ethics of Learning with Large Language Models
World language teachers' reported practices of integrating ChatGPT into instruction
Generative AI for learning languages other than English
The influence of GenAI on the effectiveness of argumentative writing in higher education
University teachers' perceptions, experiences and implications for using ChatGPT in ESL
Evaluating ChatGPT’s effectiveness in enhancing argumentative writing
Do Interactions with ChatGPT Influence L2 Learners' Oral Speaking Ability, Summarization Ability, and Perceptions of Generative AI Tasks
Human-AI collaborative reading in academic contexts
Undergraduate ESL students' use and perceptions of ChatGPT for academic writing purposes
A Study on the Efficacy of ChatGPT-4 in Enhancing Students' English Communication Skills
Mobile computing devices in higher education
Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum
Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Collaborating With ChatGPT
| Obras citantes distintas | 66 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 33 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 65 |