Clitic Production in Bilingual Children

When Exposure Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID5900992
AuthorsMaria Vender (0000-0003-1985-9184, University of Verona, corresponding author), Denis Delfitto (0000-0003-0468-1248, University of Verona), Chiara Melloni (0000-0002-4711-2689, University of Verona)
Year2018
Volume3
Issue3
Pages22
Publication date2018-06-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages3030022
OpenAlexW2811505648
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited35

The aim of this work is to investigate how bilingual children perform with respect to monolingual children in a task eliciting direct object clitic pronouns in Italian. Clitic production is considered a good clinical marker for Italian monolingual children suffering from specific language impairment (SLI) (Bortolini et al. 2006). Moreover, this task is reported to be particularly challenging for early second language children (EL2), who are less accurate than their peers in this task (Vender et al. 2016). Even though the typology of errors committed by the two populations (non-impaired bilinguals and SLI children) is generally different, it can be difficult to keep them apart from each other and, as a consequence, to identify a language impairment in bilingual children. However, it has been suggested that the difficulties exhibited by EL2 children in clitic production are related to their competence in their L2 and that they should disappear as soon as their mastery of the L2 increases. To test this prediction, we assessed clitic production in a group of 31 bilingual children having Italian as their L2 (mean age 10;2), comparing their performance to that of a group of 33 Italian monolingual children (mean age 10;2). The bilingual children used their L1 on a daily basis, as assessed by means of a bilingual exposure questionnaire, and had on average eight years of exposure to Italian; moreover, they performed similarly to monolinguals in a receptive vocabulary task, indicating that their competence in Italian was good. Consistently with our predictions, we found that bilingual children performed very accurately in the clitic elicitation task, similarly to monolinguals, confirming that the deficits previously found in EL2 children were not related to bilingualism itself, but more likely to their still incomplete competence in Italian

Clitic · Developmental psychology · Linguistic competence · Linguistics · Neuroscience of multilingualism · Specific language impairment · Vocabulary · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access