The That-Trace Effect
Evidence from Spanish-English Code-Switching
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5901285 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bradley Hoot (0000-0002-3126-5752, DePaul University, corresponding author), Shane Ebert (0000-0002-4540-8160, University of Illinois Chicago) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 189 |
| Publication date | 2021-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages6040189 |
| OpenAlex | W3212115339 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 43 |
The that-trace effect is the fact that many languages (like English) ban the extraction of embedded-clause subjects but not objects over an overt complementizer like that, while many other languages (like Spanish) allow such extractions. The effect and its cross-linguistic variation have been the subject of intense research but remain largely a mystery, with no clear consensus on their underpinnings. We contribute novel evidence to these debates by using Spanish-English code-switching (the use of two languages in one sentence) to test five contemporary theoretical accounts of the that-trace effect. We conducted a formal acceptability judgment experiment, manipulating the extracted argument and code-switch site to test different combinations of linguistic features. We found that subject extraction is only permitted in Spanish-English code-switching when both the C head (que 'that') and the T head (i.e., the verb) are in Spanish, but not when either functional head is in English. Our results demonstrate indirect support for two of the five theories we test, failing to support the other three. Our findings also provide new evidence in favor of the view that the that-trace effect is tightly linked to the availability of post-verbal subjects. Finally, we outline how our results can narrow the range of possible theoretical accounts, demonstrating how code-switching data can contribute to core questions in linguistic theory
Code-switching · Complementizer · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Programming language · Sentence · Verb · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence
On Extraction and Extraposition in German
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition
Heritage Languages and Their Speakers
The Null Subject Parameter
Issues in Italian Syntax
Classical NEG Raising
Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism
T-to-C Movement
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Interfaces + Recursion = Language?
A Prolegomenon to the Construct of the Native Speaker
Anti-locality and subject extraction
On the position of subjects in Spanish
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
C0 and Dutch-English code-switching
Code-switching attitudes and their effects on acceptability judgment tasks
Monolingual stimuli as a foundation for analyzing code-switching data
On the timing of labeling
A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory
Methodological Considerations in Code-Switching Research
The variable status of comp-trace phenomena
Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian
Parametrizing Agr
Little v and parametric variation
Anti-locality and optimality in Kaqchikel Agent Focus
Embracing edges
The bilingual as a competent but specific speaker‐hearer
Toward a model of grammaticality judgments
Mixed Verbs in Code-Switching
Null Subjects
Problems of projection
Pro-drop and Theories ofproin the Minimalist Program Part 1
On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases
Prosodic Phrasing and theThat-Trace Effect
Some properties of light verbs in code-switching
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |