Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Spatial Locative Relativization in Three African Varieties of Portuguese

Unity in Diversity and Diversity in Unity

Bibliographic Data

ID5901441
AuthorsTjerk Hagemeijer (0000-0002-0763-9312, University of Lisbon, corresponding author), Rita Gonçalves (0000-0002-0101-6261, University of Lisbon), Noel Alexandre (0000-0001-6972-1621, University of Lisbon, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume9
Issue3
Pages83
Publication date2024-02-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages9030083
OpenAlexW4392284751
LanguageEN
References cited18

This paper investigates the formation of spatial locative relativization in three African varieties of Portuguese. While research on relative constructions in Portuguese has deserved considerable attention in the literature, it tends to focus on the European and Brazilian varieties, with locative relativization being only marginally addressed. Using data extracted from spoken corpora of contemporary, urban varieties of Angolan, Mozambican, and Santomean Portuguese, we aim to discuss whether there is a correlation between syntactic and semantic variables and the selection of the two main locative relative morphemes, onde 'where' and que 'that'. Overall, the three varieties at stake behave similarly with respect to the analyzed syntactic variables and follow the tendency found in Portuguese varieties toward the use of pied-piping and P-chopping as the dominant relativization mechanisms, independent of the syntactic relation between the antecedent and the relative clause. Semantically, we identified some fine-grained differences between the three varieties, with Santomean Portuguese generally being the outlier or one of the outliers. Crucially, definiteness of the head noun stands out as the one variable that plays a major role in the selection of the relative morpheme: [−definite] head nouns show a proportionally higher preference for que in both AP and STP, which is particularly visible with bare nouns in the latter. This motivates the hypothesis that less specified head nouns show a preference for the un(der)specified relative morpheme que. We further show that the role of language contact is at best very limited

Diversity (politics · Geography · Linguistics · Locative case · Portuguese · Sociology · Unity in diversity · Anthropology · Categorization, perception, and language · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Definiteness

    Open Access•Christopher Lyons•Definiteness•1999

  • The development of locative relative markers

    Open Access•Silvia Ballarè, Guglielmo Inglese•Studies in Language•2022

  • CQPweb — combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool

    Andrew Hardie•International Journal of Corpus…•2012

  • The role of resumption in the acquisition of European Portuguese prepositional relative clauses by Chinese learners

    Open Access•Ana Espírito Santo, Nélia Alexandre et al.•Second language Research•2023

  • Interference and Natural Language Processing in Second Language Acquisition

    Open Access•Fernando Tarallo, John Myhill•Language Learning•1983

  • The Bantu relative agreement cycle

    Open Access•Mark L O Van De Velde•Linguistics•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae