Extraction from Relative Clauses in Icelandic and Swedish
A Parallel Investigation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5901487 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Filippa Lindahl (0000-0003-4042-6279, University West, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 163 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages7030163 |
| OpenAlex | W4283721590 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 19 |
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the Mainland Scandinavian languages. Recent studies on Mainland Scandinavian show that the type of dependency as well as the embedding predicate matters for the acceptability of such extractions, and the study of spontaneously produced examples has improved our ability to create felicitous extraction contexts. The studies of Icelandic extraction predate these findings, and there is to date no study which systematically compares parallel sentences in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. This article presents such a study, using two acceptability judgment experiments, one in Icelandic and one in Swedish, drawing on newly gained insights about fronting conditions in the two languages to create plausible contexts. The Icelandic participants rated extraction from relative clauses as unnatural, with a very large acceptability cost compared to in situ versions and good fillers. Extraction from að-clauses received mixed ratings, and local fronting was rated on a par with the in situ versions. In Swedish, extraction from relative clauses was rated as natural a majority of the time. There was no extraction cost in local fronting, extraction from att-clauses, or extraction from relative clauses in existential sentences, while extraction with other embedding predicates incurred some cost. No differences relating to the embedding predicate were seen in Icelandic. The study corroborates the view that extraction from relative clauses is unacceptable in Icelandic
Extraction (chemistry · Icelandic · Linguistics · Predicate (mathematical logic · Relative clause · Computer Science · History · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Information Structure
Constructions at Work
The Syntax of Icelandic
The Reality of Linguistic Rules
Learning Island-insensitivity from the input
Against the Small Clause Hypothesis
On the nature of escapable relative islands
CP-recursion in Danish
Naive v. expert intuitions
Investigating variation in island effects
Island Extractions in the Wild
Extraction and Pronoun Preposing in Scandinavian
Extraction from English RCs and Cross-Linguistic Similarities in the Environments That Facilitate Extraction
The syntax and semantics of english relative clauses
Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions
On the Island Sensitivity of Topicalization in Norwegian
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |