Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Extraction from Relative Clauses in Icelandic and Swedish

A Parallel Investigation

Bibliographic Data

ID5901487
AuthorsFilippa Lindahl (0000-0003-4042-6279, University West, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume7
Issue3
Pages163
Publication date2022-06-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/languages7030163
OpenAlexW4283721590
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the Mainland Scandinavian languages. Recent studies on Mainland Scandinavian show that the type of dependency as well as the embedding predicate matters for the acceptability of such extractions, and the study of spontaneously produced examples has improved our ability to create felicitous extraction contexts. The studies of Icelandic extraction predate these findings, and there is to date no study which systematically compares parallel sentences in Icelandic and Mainland Scandinavian. This article presents such a study, using two acceptability judgment experiments, one in Icelandic and one in Swedish, drawing on newly gained insights about fronting conditions in the two languages to create plausible contexts. The Icelandic participants rated extraction from relative clauses as unnatural, with a very large acceptability cost compared to in situ versions and good fillers. Extraction from að-clauses received mixed ratings, and local fronting was rated on a par with the in situ versions. In Swedish, extraction from relative clauses was rated as natural a majority of the time. There was no extraction cost in local fronting, extraction from att-clauses, or extraction from relative clauses in existential sentences, while extraction with other embedding predicates incurred some cost. No differences relating to the embedding predicate were seen in Icelandic. The study corroborates the view that extraction from relative clauses is unacceptable in Icelandic

Extraction (chemistry · Icelandic · Linguistics · Predicate (mathematical logic · Relative clause · Computer Science · History · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Recent Advances in Research on Island Phenomena

    Open Access•Anne Mette Nyvad, Ken Ramshøj Christensen•Languages•2023

  • Extraction and Pronoun Preposing in Scandinavian

    Open Access•Emma Engdahl, Filippa Lindahl•Languages•2022

  • On the Absence of Certain Island Effects in Mende

    Open Access•Jason D Smith•Languages•2024

  • Information Structure

    Nomi Erteschik-Shir, Nomi Erteschik‐shir•Information Structure•2007

  • Constructions at Work

    Adele Goldberg, Adele Ε Goldberg•Constructions at Work•2005

  • The Syntax of Icelandic

    Open Access•Hoskuldur Thrainsson, Höskuldur Þráinsson•Syntax of Icelandic•2007

  • The Reality of Linguistic Rules

    Susan D Lima, Roberta Corrigan et al.•The reality of linguistic rules•1994

  • Learning Island-insensitivity from the input

    Open Access•Dave Kush, Charlotte Sant et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  • Against the Small Clause Hypothesis

    Open Access•Christiane Müller•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2015

  • On the nature of escapable relative islands

    Open Access•Ken Ramshøj Christensen, Anne Mette Nyvad•Nordic Journal of Linguistics•2014

  • CP-recursion in Danish

    Anne Mette Nyvad, Ken Ramshøj Christensen et al.•The Linguistic Review•2017

  • Naive v. expert intuitions

    Ewa Dąbrowska•The Linguistic Review•2010

  • Investigating variation in island effects

    Open Access•Dave Kush, Terje Lohndal et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2018

  • Island Extractions in the Wild

    Open Access•Christiane Müller, Clara Ulrich Eggers•Languages•2022

  • Extraction and Pronoun Preposing in Scandinavian

    Open Access•Emma Engdahl, Filippa Lindahl•Languages•2022

  • Extraction from English RCs and Cross-Linguistic Similarities in the Environments That Facilitate Extraction

    Open Access•Jenny Wells Vincent, Ivy Sichel et al.•Languages•2022

  • The syntax and semantics of english relative clauses

    Open Access•James D Mccawley•Lingua•1981

  • Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions

    Open Access•Emma Engdahl, Elisabet Engdahl•Linguistics•1985

  • On the Island Sensitivity of Topicalization in Norwegian

    Open Access•Dave Kush, Terje Lohndal et al.•Language•2019

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae