Desiring the (Popular Feminist) Reader
Letters to CLEO during the Second Wave
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5903402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Megan Le Masurier (0000-0001-8137-5864, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 131 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 106-116 |
| Publication date | 2009-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Media International Australia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1329-878X • E-ISSN: 2200-467X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1329878x0913100112 |
| OpenAlex | W2274301760 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 8 |
The second wave of feminism in Australia became a popular reality for ordinary women through many forms of media, and especially through the new women's magazine Cleo. The reader letters published in Cleo throughout the 1970s provide rich, if productively problematic, evidence for the media historian's desire to interpret the meanings readers can make from magazines. In this case, the desire is to understand how younger, ordinary (non-activist) Australian women made sense of the immense challenge of feminism. Through letters written in response to Cleo's feminist journalism (and journalism about feminism), it is clear that a popular feminism was being experienced in the period of the second wave
Feminism · Journalism · Media studies · Sociology · Australian History and Society · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Media Studies and Communication
Rape, law and stories of trauma
Reading the Flesh
An Oceanic revolution? Stella and the construction of new femininities in Papua New Guinea and the Pacific
Vulnerable but Aloof Versus Naughty and Nice
The Most Revolting Ideas I've Read in a Woman's Magazine
Woman to Woman
The Royal Commission on Human Relationships and the Australian Women's Weekly, 1977-1980
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,44 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |