Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wait, am I #neurodivergent?' Exploring TikTok's influence on neurodivergent self-understanding

Bibliographic Data

ID5904786
AuthorsCaitlyn Mcmillan (0009-0007-8492-1980, University of Canterbury, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume197
Issue1
Pages121-136
Publication date2025-10-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedia International Australia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1329-878X • E-ISSN: 2200-467X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1329878x251381388
OpenAlexW4414857241
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited41

TikTok is being utilised by its many users for learning, understanding and discovering a plethora of information and experiences. One of the more notable instances of this has been the uptick in neurodivergence content popularity - with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder content being one of the most popular topics on the platform. Using semi-structured interviews and focus groups with self-identified and formally diagnosed neurodivergent New Zealand-based TikTok users, this research provides some insight into the community making and identity affirming practices that take place on TikTok in lieu of community in the offline world. The participants don't use TikTok for self-diagnosis or identification, but use it for affirming their identity, finding a sense of community and learning about the experiences of other neurodivergent people - although they are nervous about neurodivergence misinformation on the platform. This misinformation can be detrimental to neurodivergent identity and acceptance, though this research urges there should be more consideration about whether lived experience sharing can be called or is misinformation. Neurodivergence content on TikTok breaks down some of the barriers to information about neurodivergence, which have typically only been accessible through medical professionals or resources. It lets neurodivergent people see diverse representations of neurodivergent lived experiences and provides them with positive, helpful representations that enable them to self-actualise and understand their identities. Instead of neurodivergent content being framed as health information, it should instead be understood as identity work and community formation. It's imperative to consider how we can foster community and identity affirming spaces for marginalised groups offline before regulating the spaces they make for themselves online

Focus group · Misinformation · Online and offline · Online community · Online identity · Popularity · Publishing · Child Development and Digital Technology · Educational Methods and Impacts · Impact of Technology on Adolescents

  • TikTok as a Mediational Arena in the Experience of Cancer Among Adolescents and Young Adults

    Open Access•Alejandra Castaneda-Fernandez, Belén Jiménez-Alonso•Human Arenas•2026

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, Ewer Ewer•Diagnostic And Statistical Manual…•2013

  • For You, or For"You"?

    Open Access•Ellen Simpson, Bryan Semaan•Proceedings of the ACM on…•2021

  • Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity

    Open Access•Nadia Karizat, Dan Delmonaco et al.•Proceedings of the ACM on…•2021

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Braun, Victoria Clarke•Encyclopedia of Quality of Life…•2022

  • Portrayal of autism in mainstream media – a scoping review about representation, stigmatisation and effects on consumers in non-fiction and fiction media

    Open Access•Gloria Mittmann, Beate Schrank et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Neuroqueer Heresies

    Daniel Glenn, Daniel E Glenn•World Futures•2022

  • Data sovereignty and platform neutrality – A comparative study on TikTok’s data policy

    Open Access•Chunmeizi Su, Wenjia Tang•Global Media and China•2023

  • The algorithmic imaginary

    Taina Bucher•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Antecedents of support for social media content moderation and platform regulation

    Martin J Riedl, Kelsey N Whipple et al.•Information Communication & Society•2022

  • Combating stigma in autism research through centering autistic voices

    Open Access•Elizabeth A Kaplan-Kahn, Reid Caplan•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • When ‘atypical’ is the new typical

    Stéfany Boisvert, Marie-Aude Boislard et al.•Feminist Media Studies•2024

  • Extending the Internet meme

    Open Access•Diana Zulli, David James Zulli•New Media & Society•2020

  • Furthering the person-first versus identity-first language debate

    Lisa B Grech, Donna Koller et al.•Australian Psychologist•2023

  • How to train your algorithm

    Open Access•Corinne Jones•Media Culture & Society•2023

  • TikTok as algorithmically mediated biographical illumination

    Open Access•Meryl Alper, Jessica Sage Rauchberg et al.•New Media & Society•2023

  • The focus groups in social research

    Open Access•Ivana Acocella•Quality & Quantity•2011

  • The Third-Person Effect in Communication

    W Phillips Davison•Public Opinion Quarterly•1983

  • Tell Me You Have ADHD Without Telling Me You Have ADHD

    Open Access•Abigail D Leveille•Social Media + Society•2024

  • Assembling 'Sides' of TikTok

    Open Access•Jessica Maddox, Fiona Gill•Social Media + Society•2023

  • Information, influence, ritual, participation

    Open Access•K Albury, N A Hendry•Journal of Sociology•2023

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae