Scent: a Natural History of Fragrance
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Bowling Green State University |
ANO | 2021 |
TIPO | Book |
PERIÓDICO | Journal of Marriage and Family |
ISSN | 0022-2445 |
E-ISSN | 1741-3737 |
EDITORA | Sage Publications (United States) |
DOI | 10.1111/jomf.12724 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-14 |
Resumo
ObjectiveOur goal is to comment on a recently published paper (Rosenfeld & Roesler, 2019. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81, 42‐58) and provide an alternative analysis of the association between premarital cohabitation and marital instability.BackgroundTheir findings run counter to recently published papers on this topic. Although their article offers a potential explanation for this finding, the models include multiple and potentially confounding measures of time creating questions about their conclusions.MethodOur comment is based on approaches used in prior studies of cohabitation and marital instability using the same data source. Reviews of measures of time and data limitations are included along with new event history analyses focusing on marriage cohorts.ResultsTheir models arguably include too many indicators of time. Unlike the study by Rosenfeld and Roesler (2019) and consistent with other recent studies, we find that cohabitation has a weaker association with dissolution among recently married couples and cohabitation with a spouse prior to marriage is not associated with marital instability for recent marriage cohorts. This finding holds even when accounting for variation by marital duration.ConclusionThis comment provides insights into the use of the National Survey of Family Growth data ( https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/index.htm data) and measurement of time. Our results provide evidence that counters the conclusion by Rosenfeld and Roesler (2019) that scholars have been 'misled' about the role of cohabitation and marital dissolution.