Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Changing the scale and changing the result

Evaluating the impact of an electoral reform on the 2000 and 2004 US Presidential elections

Bibliographic Data

ID5914879
AuthorsRon Johnston (0000-0003-3031-8573, University of Bristol, corresponding author), David Rossiter (University of Leeds), Charles Pattie (0000-0003-4578-178X, University of Sheffield)
Year2006
Volume25
Issue5
Pages557-569
Publication date2006-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Geography (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0962-6298 • E-ISSN: 1873-5096
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.03.009
OpenAlexW2086147020
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited15

CONTEST · Democracy · Economics · Electoral college · Electoral reform · General election · Geography · Group voting ticket · Microeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Spoilt vote · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Public Administration · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Multi-scale issues in cross-border comparative analysis

    Open Access•Jianquan Cheng, A Stewart Fotheringham•Geoforum•2013

  • The Suburbanisation of Political Representation in a Context of Proportional Representation

    Open Access•Filip De Maesschalck•Tijdschrift voor Economische en…•2011

  • The U.S. Electoral College and Spatial Biases in Voter Power

    Barney Warf•Annals of the Association of…•2009

  • The electors shall meet in their respective states

    Open Access•Charles Pattie, Ron Johnston•Political Geography•2014

  • Seats, Votes, and the Spatial Organization of Elections

    Graham Gudgin•Seats, Votes, and the Spatial…•1980

  • Electoral Systems and Party Systems

    Arend Lijphart•Electoral systems and party systems•1994

  • The political consequences of electoral laws

    Douglas W Rae•The political consequences of…•1971

  • Electoral Distortion in New Zealand

    Open Access•R H Brookes•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1959

  • He lost…but he won! electoral bias and George W. Bush's victory in the US presidential election, 2000

    Ron Johnston, Charles Pattie et al.•Representation•2001

  • Partisan bias in British general elections

    Adrian Blau•Journal of Elections Public…•2001

  • Why the Electoral College Is Bad for America

    Open Access•G Terry Madonna•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The Politics of Electoral College Reform

    Paul J Piccard, Lawrence D Longley et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1973

  • The Analysis of Distorted Representation in Two-Party Single-Member Elections

    Open Access•R H Brookes•Political Science•1960

  • A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans

    Andrew Gelman, Gary King•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Manipulating maps and winning elections

    Open Access•Ron Johnston•Political Geography•2002

  • Disproportionality and bias in US Presidential Elections

    Open Access•Ron Johnston, David Rossiter et al.•Political Geography•2005

  • An integrated perspective on the three potential sources of partisan bias

    Open Access•B Grofman, William Koetzle et al.•Electoral Studies•1997

  • The People's President

    Neal Peirce, Neal R Peirce et al.•American Political Science Review•1982

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,24
Citation span2009 - 2014 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae