A Atuação da Sociedade Civil no Processo Brasileiro de Refúgio
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5917013 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Flávia Rodrigues De Castro (0000-0001-9951-5271, Universidade La Salle, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 58 |
| Pages | 147-165 |
| Publication date | 2020-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | REMHU Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1980-8585 • E-ISSN: 2237-9843 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/1980-85852503880005809 |
| OpenAlex | W3025898545 |
| SciELO | S1980-85852020000100147 |
| Language | PT |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 31 |
O processo brasileiro de determinação do status de refugiado é governado pelo Comitê Nacional para Refugiados (CONARE)1 - órgão administrativo que julga a credibilidade dos solicitantes de refúgio e tem poder de decisão sobre os casos - com participação ativa da sociedade civil. O presente artigo propõe analisar a atuação da sociedade civil neste processo através das práticas epistêmicas responsáveis por julgar quem pode ser categorizado como refugiado. Para tanto, será utilizada aqui uma abordagem teórica que enfatiza a possibilidade de produção de injustiças epistêmicas nas análises de credibilidade
Civil society · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Development, Ethics, and Society · Law · Migration, Racism, and Human Rights · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy
Anthropology and Expertise in the Asylum Courts
Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice
Culpability for Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic injustice in healthcare
Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions
Common Burdens and Standards
The Beleaguered Gatekeeper
Questions of Credibility
Refugee Status Determinations and the Limits of Memory
Interpretation, translation and intercultural communication in refugee status determination procedures in the UK and France
Beyond the Law
Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing
Trust, Testimony, and Prejudice in the Credibility Economy
Epistemic Injustice and Open‐Mindedness
Vile liars and truth distorters’; Truth, trust and the asylum system (Respond to this article at http
The deserving and the undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain
Refugee status determination conducted by UNHCR
Credibility, Proof and Refugee Law
Is Trust an Epistemological Notion
The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice
The Complexity of Determining Refugeehood
Constructing truths in a culture of disbelief
The Politics of Credibility
The epistemic logic of asylum screening
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |