Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Community-Engaged Research Builds a Nature-Culture of Hope on North American Great Plains Rangelands

Bibliographic Data

ID5933767
AuthorsHailey Wilmer (0000-0003-0810-9687, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area, corresponding author), Lauren M Porensky (0000-0001-6883-2442, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), María E Fernández-Giménez (0000-0001-9641-1434, Colorado State University), Justin D Derner, Justin Derner (0000-0001-8076-0736, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), David J Augustine (0000-0003-3144-0466, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), John P Ritten (0000-0002-6468-3870, University of Wyoming), Dannele P Peck, Dannele E Peck (0000-0001-5464-8097, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area)
Year2019
Volume8
Issue1
Pages22
Publication date2019-01-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci8010022
OpenAlexW2909480568
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited105

In the North American Great Plains, multigenerational ranches and grassland biodiversity are threatened by dynamic and uncertain climatic, economic, and land use processes. Working apart, agricultural and conservation communities face doubtful prospects of reaching their individual goals of sustainability. Rangeland research could serve a convening platform, but experimental studies seldom involve local manager communities. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) project, however, has undertaken a ten-year, ranch-level, participatory research effort to explore how community-engaged research can increase our understanding of conservation and ranching goals. Using ethnographic data and the nature-culture concept-which recognizes the inseparability of ecological relationships that are shaped by both biological and social processes-we examine the CARM team's process of revising their management objectives (2016-2018). In CARM's early days, the team established locally-relevant multifunctional goals and objectives. As team members' understanding of the ecosystem improved, they revised objectives using more spatially, temporally and ecologically specific information. During the revision process, they challenged conventional ecological theories and grappled with barriers to success outside of their control. The emerging CARM nature-culture, based on a sense of place and grounded in hope, provides insights into effective community-engaged research to enhance rangeland livelihood and conservation outcomes

Agriculture · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Ethnobiology · Geography · Livelihood · Rangeland · Rangeland management · Sociology · Sustainability · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Social learning lessons from Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management

    Open Access•Hailey Wilmer, Terri Schulz et al.•Rangelands•2022

  • Why we should consider cattle partners

    Open Access•Anna Clare Monlezun•Rangelands•2023

  • Communal processes of health and well-being for rangelands research and practice

    Open Access•Amanda L Bentley Brymer, J D Wulfhorst et al.•Rangelands•2022

  • Seeking common ground

    Open Access•Anna Clare Monlezun, Kelly W Jones et al.•Rangelands•2024

  • The Emotional Dimensions of Animal Disease Management

    Open Access•Klaus Epstein, Emma Von Essen et al.•Frontiers in Human Dynamics•2021

  • Doing rural community-based action research (CBAR)

    Open Access•Amy M Magnus, Kristen Rai•Qualitative Research•2024

  • The Oxford Handbook of Hope

    Matthew W Gallagher, Shane J Lopez•The Oxford Handbook of Hope•2017

  • The International Encyclopedia of Primatology

    Open Access•A Fuentes•International Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • Multifunctional agriculture

    G A Wilson•Multifunctional Agriculture•2007

  • Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Nurturing Hope

    Open Access•C R Snyder•Journal of Counseling & Development•1995

  • Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications

    Open Access•Shankar Aswani, Anne Lemahieu et al.•PLoS ONE•2018

  • Sense of Place

    D Williams, Daniel R Williams et al.•Journal of Forestry•1998

  • Opportunistic Management for Rangelands Not at Equilibrium

    Mark Westoby, Brian Walker et al.•Journal of Range Management•1989

  • The science of team science

    Open Access•Kara L Hall, Amanda L Vogel et al.•American Psychologist•2018

  • Adaptive co‐management for social–ecological complexity

    Open Access•Derek R Armitage, Derek Armitage et al.•Frontiers in Ecology and the…•2009

  • Dynamics and Resilience of Rangelands and Pastoral Peoples Around the Globe

    Open Access•Robin S Reid, María E Fernández-Giménez et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2014

  • Optimism, coping, and health

    Michael F Scheier, Charles S Carver•Health Psychology•1985

  • But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba•New Directions for Program…•1986

  • Primates Face to Face

    Open Access•Agustin Fuentes, Linda D Wolfe•Primates Face to Face•2002

  • Ivory-Billed Woodpecker (Campephilus Principalis)

    Jerome A Jackson•The Auk•2006

  • The Politics of Scale

    Nathan F Sayre•Politics of Scale•2016

  • Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change

    Open Access•A K Jorgenson, Shirley J Fiske et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2019

  • The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research

    Open Access•Vanessa A Masterson, Richard C Stedman et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Evaluating strategies for sustainable intensification of US agriculture through the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research network

    Open Access•Sheri Spiegal, Brandon T Bestelmeyer et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Human/Nature Interaction in the Anthropocene Potential of Social-Ecological Systems Analysis

    Marion Glaser, Gesche Krause et al.•GAIA - Ecological Perspectives…•2008

  • The Concept of a Cultural Landscape

    Val Plumwood•Ethics & the Environment•2006

  • Sense of place

    Open Access•F Stuart Chapin, Corrine N Knapp•Environmental Science & Policy•2015

  • Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries

    Open Access•Neil Marshall, N A Marshall•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • Ranchland Ownership Change in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, 1990–2001

    Hannah Gosnell, Julia H Haggerty et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2006

  • Beyond Design Principles

    Andrea J Nightingale•Society & Natural Resources•2010

  • Collaboration Derailed

    Peter A Walker, Patrick T Hurley•Society & Natural Resources•2004

  • Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia

    Open Access•John Holmes•Journal of Rural Studies•2005

  • Resilience thinking meets social theory

    Open Access•Muriel Côte, Andrea J Nightingale•Progress in Human Geography•2011

  • The politics of barstool biology

    Open Access•Paul Robbins•Geoforum•2005

  • Natureculture

    Nicholas Malone, Kathryn Ovenden•The International Encyclopedia of…•2016

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Ethical doings in naturecultures

    Maria Puig De La Bellacasa•Ethics Place & Environment•2010

  • Amenity migration

    Open Access•Hannah Gosnell, J Abrams•GeoJournal•2009

  • Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Jamie Lorimer•Progress in Human Geography•2012

  • Summary

    Open Access•Kathi K Beratan•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Ecosystem Services are Social-ecological Services in a Traditional Pastoral System

    Open Access•Lynn Huntsinger, José L Oviedo•Conservation Ecology•2014

  • Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring

    Open Access•María E Fernández-Giménez, Heidi L Ballard et al.•Conservation Ecology•2008

  • A shepherd has to invent

    Open Access•María E Fernández-Giménez•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Qualitative Research, Appropriation of the 'Other' and Empowerment

    Open Access•Anne Opie•Feminist Review•1992

  • Revisiting distinctions between ranching and pastoralism

    Open Access•Olivier Larocque•Critique of Anthropology•2014

  • Embattled Ranchers, Endangered Species, and Urban Sprawl

    Thomas E Sheridan•Annual Review of Anthropology•2007

  • Soil as Social-Ecological Feedback

    Open Access•Gabrielle Roesch‐mcnally, J G Arbuckle et al.•Rural Sociology•2018

  • The Symbiotic Ideology

    Open Access•Colter Ellis•Rural Sociology•2013

  • Pyrenean Pastoralists' Ecological Knowledge

    Open Access•María E Fernández-Giménez, Federico Fillat Estaque•Human Ecology•2012

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae