Community-Engaged Research Builds a Nature-Culture of Hope on North American Great Plains Rangelands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5933767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hailey Wilmer (0000-0003-0810-9687, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area, corresponding author), Lauren M Porensky (0000-0001-6883-2442, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), María E Fernández-Giménez (0000-0001-9641-1434, Colorado State University), Justin D Derner, Justin Derner (0000-0001-8076-0736, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), David J Augustine (0000-0003-3144-0466, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area), John P Ritten (0000-0002-6468-3870, University of Wyoming), Dannele P Peck, Dannele E Peck (0000-0001-5464-8097, Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 22 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci8010022 |
| OpenAlex | W2909480568 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 105 |
In the North American Great Plains, multigenerational ranches and grassland biodiversity are threatened by dynamic and uncertain climatic, economic, and land use processes. Working apart, agricultural and conservation communities face doubtful prospects of reaching their individual goals of sustainability. Rangeland research could serve a convening platform, but experimental studies seldom involve local manager communities. The Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management (CARM) project, however, has undertaken a ten-year, ranch-level, participatory research effort to explore how community-engaged research can increase our understanding of conservation and ranching goals. Using ethnographic data and the nature-culture concept-which recognizes the inseparability of ecological relationships that are shaped by both biological and social processes-we examine the CARM team's process of revising their management objectives (2016-2018). In CARM's early days, the team established locally-relevant multifunctional goals and objectives. As team members' understanding of the ecosystem improved, they revised objectives using more spatially, temporally and ecologically specific information. During the revision process, they challenged conventional ecological theories and grappled with barriers to success outside of their control. The emerging CARM nature-culture, based on a sense of place and grounded in hope, provides insights into effective community-engaged research to enhance rangeland livelihood and conservation outcomes
Agriculture · Environmental ethics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Ethnobiology · Geography · Livelihood · Rangeland · Rangeland management · Sociology · Sustainability · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
Social learning lessons from Collaborative Adaptive Rangeland Management
Why we should consider cattle partners
Communal processes of health and well-being for rangelands research and practice
Seeking common ground
The Emotional Dimensions of Animal Disease Management
Doing rural community-based action research (CBAR)
The Oxford Handbook of Hope
The International Encyclopedia of Primatology
Multifunctional agriculture
Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Nurturing Hope
Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications
Sense of Place
Opportunistic Management for Rangelands Not at Equilibrium
The science of team science
Adaptive co‐management for social–ecological complexity
Dynamics and Resilience of Rangelands and Pastoral Peoples Around the Globe
Optimism, coping, and health
But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation
Primates Face to Face
Ivory-Billed Woodpecker (Campephilus Principalis)
The Politics of Scale
Social science perspectives on drivers of and responses to global climate change
The contribution of sense of place to social-ecological systems research
Evaluating strategies for sustainable intensification of US agriculture through the Long-Term Agroecosystem Research network
Human/Nature Interaction in the Anthropocene Potential of Social-Ecological Systems Analysis
The Concept of a Cultural Landscape
Sense of place
Understanding social resilience to climate variability in primary enterprises and industries
Ranchland Ownership Change in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, 1990–2001
Beyond Design Principles
Collaboration Derailed
Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia
Resilience thinking meets social theory
The politics of barstool biology
Natureculture
Naturalistic inquiry
Ethical doings in naturecultures
Amenity migration
Multinatural geographies for the Anthropocene
Summary
Ecosystem Services are Social-ecological Services in a Traditional Pastoral System
Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring
A shepherd has to invent
Qualitative Research, Appropriation of the 'Other' and Empowerment
Revisiting distinctions between ranching and pastoralism
Embattled Ranchers, Endangered Species, and Urban Sprawl
Soil as Social-Ecological Feedback
The Symbiotic Ideology
Pyrenean Pastoralists' Ecological Knowledge
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2024 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |