Authoritarian States and Global Sport

The Contested Cases of Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia

Bibliographic Data

ID5935591
AuthorsJonathan Grix (0000-0001-7315-1641, Manchester Metropolitan University, corresponding author), Paul Michael Brannagan (0000-0002-4003-8420, Manchester Metropolitan University)
Year2024
Volume13
Issue12
Pages701
Publication date2024-12-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci13120701
OpenAlexW4405720899
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited38

Sport and authoritarianism have long been bedfellows, especially during the Cold War era. 'Traditional' authoritarian regimes-most notably the Soviet Union and its satellite states-learnt the art of instrumentalizing sport for political ends from each other. Motives for this included garnering international prestige via excellence in elite sport and showcasing communism as a viable alternative to capitalism. This paper shows how the 'new' authoritarian states are now beginning to impact global elite sport through similar sports investment strategies in an array of sports teams, sports sponsorship and sports leagues. Whereas 'traditional' authoritarian states sought sporting excellence on the playing field and the recognition this brought with it, the 'new' authoritarian states seek to buy into the cultural power and prestige of global elite sport for economic gain, to improve the health of their citizens and for global recognition. We draw on recent examples from Qatar, the UAE and Saudi Arabia to understand why and how 'new' authoritarian states pursue sport policies and why this is contested

Authoritarianism · Democracy · Development economics · Economics · Political science · Politics · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sports, Gender, and Society

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access