Elevating Student Voice and Levelling Traditional Power Hierarchies Through Open Textbook Co-Creation
What Do Students Say
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5936262 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bianca Masuku (0000-0002-9746-5183, University of Cape Town, corresponding author), Glenda Cox (0000-0001-8185-0645, University of Cape Town), Michelle Willmers (0000-0002-4925-2028, University of Cape Town) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 6 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci14010006 |
| OpenAlex | W4405850483 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 36 |
There are calls for the democratisation of higher education in line with the principles of social justice. Collaboration with students offers the potential for creating a more inclusive higher education environment, and open textbook development initiatives can be a vehicle for change. This paper focuses on the experiences of students as co-creators in open textbook initiatives at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Drawing on interviews with 11 open textbook collaborators, this paper utilises Nancy Fraser's social justice framework to explore students' perspectives on injustices, challenges of collaboration and co-creation, and power dynamics in student-staff partnerships. The study shows that students experience and navigate various injustices in their classroom contexts related to economic maldistribution, cultural misrecognition and political misrepresentation. It reveals a complex interrelationship between student voice, power dynamics in the classroom, and the power of student-staff partnerships to build confidence and flatten hierarchies in open textbook co-creation. The student views presented here provide powerful evidence of a range of benefits they experience when the traditional hierarchies between student and lecturer are levelled through collaborative open textbook development processes. Results indicate that co-creation activities enabled them to have a voice through the power of publication and own their academic journeys
Democracy · Democratization · Misrepresentation · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Power structure · Public relations · Sociology · Higher Education Learning Practices · Higher Education Practises and Engagement
The Privileged Poor
Sustainable open textbook models for social justice
Digital education utopia
Open Textbook Author Journeys
Global crisis management and higher education
From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age
Reframing the curriculum
An ‘ unavoidable ’ dynamic? Understanding the ‘traditional’ learner–teacher power relationship within a higher education context
Contesting anticipatory regimes in education
Possibilities towards a socially just pedagogy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |