Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking the Unthinkable

A Delphi Study on Remote Work during Covid-19 Pandemic

Bibliographic Data

ID5936401
AuthorsTeresa Galanti (0000-0003-1926-4877, University of Chieti-Pescara, corresponding author), Bruna Ferrara (0000-0002-7438-8840, Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta), Paula Benevene (0000-0002-7899-723X, Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta), Ilaria Buonomo (0000-0001-8212-6798, Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta)
Year2023
Volume12
Issue9
Pages497
Publication date2023-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci12090497
OpenAlexW4386417628
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited53

Background: The outbreak of COVID-19 pushed organizations towards the adoption of new ways of organizing the workplace, to contrast the diffusion of the virus as well as to ensure the production of goods and services. Many workers and employers were suddenly forced to switch to forms of remote work, quite often without any real preparation to successfully deal with these changes. This exploratory study aimed to investigate the point of view of Italian HR managers on the introduction of these new ways of working in Italian SMEs, to underline both the advantages and risks of remote work and to provide a shared list of best and worst practices related to remote work adoption. A Panel of 19 Italian experts of HR management was recruited in April 2022 to perform a Delphi study. They were asked to take part in an anonymous and asynchronous discussion started with stimulus questions, on their remote working experience during the pandemic. A mixed-methods approach was adopted for data collection and analysis. Results: Five principal themes emerged, related to both the positive and negative implications of the adoption of hybrid and remote work, namely: work-life balance, environmental sustainability, impact of working life on individual wellbeing and health, and technological improvement. The content analysis was realized with the use of the T-Lab software, stressing the risks of inaccurate planning and management of these new ways of work. Conclusions: This is the first application of a Delphi study in the Italian context on the impact of COVID-19 on work-life transformative processes. The results highlight the importance of clear communication, transparency, trust, and technology in successfully implementing remote and hybrid forms of work. By implementing these best practices, organizations can create a work environment that supports remote and hybrid work, fosters collaboration, and maintains productivity. The findings of this study can serve as a useful guide for organizations that are transitioning to remote or hybrid work models

Business · Context (archaeology · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Delphi · Delphi method · Knowledge management · Pandemic · Personal protective equipment · Political science · Public relations · Sustainability · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Technostress in Professional Settings · Work-Family Balance Challenges

  • Revisiting Psychological Contract Measurement

    Open Access•Adrián García-Selva, Beatriz Martín del Río et al.•Social Sciences•2025

  • How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings

    Open Access•Tammy D Allen, Timothy D Golden et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2015

  • Wellbeing Costs of Technology Use during Covid-19 Remote Working

    Open Access•Monica Molino, Emanuela Ingusci et al.•Sustainability•2020

  • Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators

    Open Access•Rym Boulkedid, Hendy Abdoul et al.•PLoS ONE•2011

  • The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting

    Ravi S Gajendran, David A Harrison•Journal of Applied Psychology•2007

  • Supporting the productivity and wellbeing of remote workers

    Open Access•Thomas J George, Leanne Atwater et al.•Organizational Dynamics•2022

  • Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment

    Nena Bloom, Nicholas Bloom et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2014

  • Not All Remote Workers Are Similar

    Open Access•Simone Donati, Gianluca Viola et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Work as a recovery factor after earthquake

    Open Access•Teresa Galanti, Michela Cortini•Disaster Prevention and…•2019

  • Leading and Working From Home in Times of Covid-19

    Open Access•Janka I Stoker, Harry Garretsen et al.•Journal of Leadership &…•2021

  • Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements

    Open Access•Barbara Green, Melanie Jones et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•1999

  • Triangulating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches for the Analysis of Textual Materials

    Open Access•Michela Cortini, Stefania Tria•Social Science Computer Review•2013

  • Self‐leadership in the context of part‐time teleworking

    Open Access•Teresa Müller, Cornelia Niessen•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2019

  • Is a Good Boss Always a Plus? LMX, Family-Work Conflict, and Remote Working Satisfaction during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Ferdinando Toscano, Salvatore Zappalà et al.•Social Sciences•2022

  • Gender, Parenting, and The Rise of Remote Work During the Pandemic

    Open Access•Allison Dunatchik, Kathleen Gerson et al.•Gender & Society•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae