Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Guilty When Innocent. Australian Government's Resistance to Bringing Home Wives and Children of Islamic State Fighters

Bibliographic Data

ID5936670
AuthorsJoumanah El-Matrah (Western Sydney University, corresponding author), Kamalle Dabboussy
Year2021
Volume10
Issue6
Pages202
Publication date2021-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/socsci10060202
OpenAlexW3168668763
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited7

Currently there are 20 Australian women and 47 children being held in the Al-Roj camp in Northern Syria, who are the family members of Islamic State fighters. The Australian government argues that it is both unsafe for government officials to rescue those held in the camp and unsafe for Australia to repatriate these women and children. This security rhetoric is commonly understood as Australia's abandonment of its citizens and their entitlements to protection and repatriation. This paper argues that the Australian government is condemning its citizens to a condition of statelessness and displacement, simulating the following conditions under which refugees and asylum seekers are forced to live: murder, violence, deprivation of adequate food and shelter, disease, and the potential hazards of the COVID-19 infection. Rendering its citizens to a condition of statelessness and displacement constitutes both punishment meted out on those deemed guilty by their presence in Syria, and provides the Australian government the opportunity to revoke the citizenship of women and children. Three Australian women who travelled to Syria have already been stripped of their Australian citizenship. This paper explores the conditions and methods by which the Australian government has erased the entitlements, protections and certainty of citizenship for Australian Muslim women and children

Citizenship · Criminology · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Refugee · Repatriation · Sociology · State (computer science · Statelessness · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • The Impossibility of Home

    Open Access•Lucy Fiske, Linda Briskman•Social Sciences•2021

  • Take Them or Leave Them? Gendered Obstacles in Advocacy Work for the Repatriation of Is Affiliates

    Open Access•Lorraine B Jackson, Ariane Bogain•International Feminist Journal of…•2025

  • No Country For ‘Bad’ Men

    Open Access•Milena Tripkovic•The British Journal of Criminology•2023

  • Securitization and the liberalism of fear

    Open Access•M C Williams•Security Dialogue•2011

  • Democracies and the Power to Revoke Citizenship

    Open Access•P T Lenard•Ethics & International Affairs•2016

  • The radicalisation of citizenship deprivation

    Open Access•Tufyal Choudhury•Critical Social Policy•2017

  • Stereotypes of Muslims and Support for the War on Terror

    Josh Sides, John Sides et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Denaturalisation and conceptions of citizenship in the 'war on terror

    Patrick Sykes•Citizenship Studies•2016

  • Why Should We Have to Prove We're Alright

    Open Access•Gabe Mythen, Sandra Walklate et al.•Sociology•2013

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae