When Sexting Crosses the Line
Educator Responsibilities in the Support of Prosocial Adolescent Behavior and the Prevention of Violence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5936737 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Melinda Lemke (0000-0001-8425-6289, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, corresponding author), Katelyn Rogers (0009-0002-1727-7017, University at Buffalo, State University of New York) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 150 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci9090150 |
| OpenAlex | W3081457721 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 35 |
This article presents findings from a systematic literature review that examined various forms of adolescent sexting, and as relevant to educator responsibilities in the support of prosocial behavior and teen dating violence (TDV) prevention within the United States. Proceeding in three parts, part one documents study methodology and offers an overview of adolescent sexting. This section also discusses tensions between sexting as adolescent empowerment and as a form of dating violence. This is followed by a deeper examination of how adolescent sexting is connected to other forms of sexual violence documented to disproportionately affect heterosexual females. Though laws on sexting are minimal, part three discusses U.S. federal and Supreme Court guidance having particular significance for this issue. This section also presents the case of New York State (NYS) to consider the connection between localized policies and schooling practices. Concerned with sexting as a form of consensual adolescent behavior, this article concludes with considerations for educational research, policy, and practice. This article contributes to established research literature weighing the prosocial aspects of sexting against those factors that contribute to and make it difficult to leave a violent relationship. Though empirical research was limited, it also highlights existent research on sexting as relevant to underserved and marginalized adolescent subgroups
Criminology · Developmental psychology · Empowerment · Political science · Prosocial behavior · Child Development and Digital Technology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Law · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology
Why women avoid sexting
Image-based sexual abuse profiles
Declining nudes
Education as a Field of Contention
Something You Just Don’t Talk About”
A feminist critical heuristic for educational policy analysis
Adolescents, Sexting, Consent and Coercion; a Critical Discursive Psychology Approach
Teachers' Discursive Constructions of Adolescent Sexting, Consent and Gender
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis
Sexting Panic
Sextortion of Minors
Teen Sexting and Its Association With Sexual Behaviors
Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth
Sexting
Abstinence-Only Education and Teen Pregnancy Rates
Prevalence and Correlates of Sexting Behavior in Adolescents
Sexting prevalence and correlates
Sexting Among Young Adults
Association of Sexting With Sexual Behaviors and Mental Health Among Adolescents
Sexting, psychological distress and dating violence among adolescents and young adults
Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't…If You're a Girl
‘Technology, hormones, and stupidity’
Adolescent Profiles According to Their Beliefs and Affinity to Sexting. A Cluster Study
Communication rights from the margins
Educating refugee and Hurricane displaced youth in troubled times
Developing Teen Dating Violence Prevention Strategies
Sexting, consent and young people's ethics
Onset Trajectories of Sexting and Other Sexual Behaviors Across High School
Consensual sexting among adolescents
Queering Sexting and Sexualisation
Online, Offline, and Over the Line
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |