Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Designing AI to Think with Us, Not for Us

Bibliographic Data

ID5948092
AuthorsStefanie Hutka (Sendfull LLC, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume2024
Issue1
Pages112-133
Publication date2024-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (CONFERENCE)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1559-890X • E-ISSN: 1559-8918
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/epic.12198
OpenAlexW4407381055
LanguageEN
References cited19

This paper establishes a framework and toolkit for designing Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) that address foundational challenges of these technologies and reframe the problem-solution space. The stakes are high for human-centered solutions: genAI is rapidly disrupting existing markets with technologies that exhibit increasingly complex and emergent abilities, and accelerate scale, cognitive offloading, and distributed cognition. The Problem-Solution Symbiosis framework and toolkit extends, rather than displaces, human cognition, including tools for envisioning, problem (re)framing and selection, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the alignment of stakeholder needs with the strengths of a genAI system. Applying the toolkit helps us guide the development of useful, desirable genAI by building intuition about system capabilities, developing a systemic understanding of emerging problem spaces, and using a matrix to identify if and when to offload tasks to the system. The framework is informed by systems theory, frame analysis, human-computer interaction research on current AI design approaches, and analogous approaches from spatial computing design research

Cognitive science · Data science · Epistemology · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Innovative Human-Technology Interaction · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Cognitive Offloading

    Open Access•Evan F Risko, Sam J Gilbert•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2016

  • Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation

    Open Access•T Stivers, N J Enfield et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Moving beyond user-centered design

    Open Access•Jodi Forlizzi•interactions•2018

  • Boundary Negotiating Artifacts

    Open Access•Charlotte P Lee•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2007

  • Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models

    Open Access•Isabel O Gallegos, Ryan A Rossi et al.•Computational Linguistics•2024

  • Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects

    Open Access•Susan Leigh Star, James Griesemer et al.•Social Studies of Science•1989

  • Ethnographic Thinking for Wicked Problems

    Open Access•Jay Hasbrouck, Charley Scull et al.•Ethnographic Praxis in Industry…•2016

  • Grounded Models

    Open Access•Tom Hoy, Iman Munire Bilal et al.•Ethnographic Praxis in Industry…•2023

  • Toward an Ethnography of Friction and Ease in Complex Systems

    Open Access•Benjamin Chesluk, Mike Youngblood•Ethnographic Praxis in Industry…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae