Taking Sides in E-cigarette Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5948464 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rachelle Annechino (0000-0002-2436-3178, Prevention Group, corresponding author), Tamar M J Antin (0000-0002-2490-419X, Prevention Group, corresponding author), Tamar Antin (ResearchScientistAtThePreventionResearchCenterAndDirectorOfTheCriticalPublicHealthResearchGroup) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 2016 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 105-119 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings (CONFERENCE) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1559-890X • E-ISSN: 1559-8918 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/1559-8918.2016.01079 |
| PMID | 29456462 |
| OpenAlex | W2558581028 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 27 |
In the last ten years, an eclectic mix of electronic nicotine delivery products ('e-cigarettes') and practices have proliferated in the US with little restriction, producing a vast array of vaping mechanisms, flavors, and styles. At the same time, anti-tobacco movements have targeted e-cigarettes as a threat to public health and advocated for restricting e-cigarettes in much the same way as conventional cigarettes. While anti-vaping proponents associated with public health movements have typically regarded e-cigarettes as primarily harmful products that should be suppressed, vaping advocates regard e-cigarettes as harm reduction products that should be readily accessible to smokers. Distrust between these two warring "sides" animates the controversy over e-cigarettes. In our role as researchers conducting a qualitative study on e-cigarette use, we encountered suspicion and anger from members of an e-cigarette forum who felt that pro-vaping perspectives were often misrepresented by researchers. As a result, we dropped our initial plan to host a group discussion of questions directly related to our study on the forum. Nevertheless, the incident illuminated how vaping advocates have resisted dominant narratives regarding tobacco and nicotine use, destabilized nicotine product categories and challenged interpretations of nicotine use that dichotomize pleasure and health
Advertising · Business · Distrust · Electronic cigarette · Harm · Harm reduction · Nicotine · Pleasure · Political science · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Public health · Public relations · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Psychology · Smoking Behavior and Cessation · Social Psychology
Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics
Cultural Criminology and the Carnival of Crime
The Perils of Ignoring History
Men, women and sexuality
Obsolete tobacco control themes can be hazardous to public health
Smokers' beliefs about “Light” and “Ultra Light” cigarettes
The slow growth of a movement
Beliefs about “Light” and “Ultra Light” cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs
Drugs’ pleasures
The attention economy and the Net
Whose side are we on and for whom do we write? Notes on issues and challenges facing those researching and evaluating public policy
YouTube and You Experiences of Self-Awareness in the Context Collapse of the Recording Webcam
Bakhtin and Carnival
A Sociolegal History of the Tobacco Tort Litigation
I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately
Writing Critical Ethnography
Whose Side Are We On
Conflicting Discourses in Qualitative Research
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |