Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why not use contraception? Economics of fertility regulation among rural Egyptian women

Bibliographic Data

ID5957941
AuthorsWayne A Schutjer (Issues Research, corresponding author), C Shannon Stokes (Pennsylvania State University), John R Poindexter, John Poindexter (Pennsylvania State University)
Year1986
Volume33
Issue3-4
Pages214-228
Publication date1986-09-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBiodemography and Social Biology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1948-5565 • E-ISSN: 1948-5573
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/19485565.1986.9988640
OpenAlexW2068459503
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Use of contraception by rural Egyptian women who desire no more children is examined within a modified microeconomic framework. Four sets of factors are hypothesized to influence current use of contraception: (1) costs of contraception, ‘(2) factors influencing the slope of the desired family size function, (3) anticipated costs of child rearing and (4) strength of motivation for fertility regulation. Women's education and two measures of psychic costs were found to be important predictors of contraceptive use. Factors affecting the demand for children and thus indirectly influencing the motivation for fertility regulation were also important. Land ownership, cultivating status of the household, and educational expectations for children were significantly related to current use. Strength of motivation, although significant, was less strongly related to use of contraception. The findings suggest women who want no more children, but who are not practicing contraception, are affected by factors influencing both the costs of contraception and the costs of an unwanted child

Developmental psychology · Environmental health · Family planning · Fertility · Population · Research methodology · Sociology · Demography · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine · Psychology

  • Fraught with Ambivalence

    Open Access•Victor Agadjanian•Population Research and Policy…•2005

  • The Demand for Family Planning

    Richard A Easterlin, Kua Wongboonsin et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1988

  • Historical Studies of Changing Fertility

    Charles Tilly•Historical Studies of Changing…•2015

  • A Note on Desired Family Size and Contraceptive use in Rural Egypt

    Open Access•C Shannon Stokes, Wayne A Schutjer et al.•Journal of Biosocial Science•1983

  • Agricultural policies and human fertility

    Open Access•Wayne A Schutjer, C Shannon Stokes•Population Research and Policy…•1982

  • An Economic Framework for Fertility Analysis

    Richard A Easterlin•Studies in Family Planning•1975

  • Trends in Fertility, Family Size Preferences, and Family Planning Practice

    Ming-Cheng Chang, Ming‐Cheng Chang et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1981

  • Family Planning in Rural Egypt 1980

    Farhat Yusuf•Population Studies•1985

  • Rural Development and Human Fertility

    M C, Wayne A Schutjer et al.•Population and Development Review•1985

Citations per year0.05
Citation span1988 - 2005 (18)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae