Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The disaffiliative use of ‘did you know’ questions in Arabic news interviews

The case of Aljazeera’s ‘The Opposite Direction

Bibliographic Data

ID5965099
AuthorsDana Shalash (Kenyon College, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume22
Issue5
Pages590-609
Publication date2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445620916367
OpenAlexW3040464711
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

This article studies the use of ‘hal taʔlaam’ (‘did you know’, hereafter) questions by the interviewer (IR) as a discursive strategy to block the interviewees’ (IEs’) agenda and stance in Aljazeera’s ‘The Opposite Direction’, a weekly news interview program that broadcasts live in Arabic on Aljazeera. The show has been on the air since Aljazeera’s inception, in the mid 1990s. The show hosts two guests with opposing political views, who are pitted against each other in a heated discussion as they represent and defend their own political and institutional affiliation. This article shows how IR uses ‘did you know’ questions to express adversarialness with his interviewees. The article argues that IR uses this type of questioning as an agenda blocking practice that the IR orients to as confrontational. The dataset examined in this article shows that ‘did you know’ questions do not provide any new information, nor does it seem to expect a response from the addressee. In fact, they are regularly used by the IR in this specific program to provide an account for previous turns that did not receive the desired response from the IE. They are lengthy, said in clear, loud Standard Arabic, and they typically embed ‘hostile presuppositions’ and confrontational messages. For the analysis presented here, 20, 50-minute episodes from ‘The Opposite Direction’ are examined following Conversation Analysis as the analytic method

Arabic · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Epistemology · Interview · Linguistics · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Presupposition · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology

  • Equivocation in media communication

    Open Access•Abdulrahman Alroumi•Journal of Language and Politics•2025

  • The News Interview

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven Clayman et al.•News Interview•2002

  • Talk in Action

    Open Access•J Heritage, E Clayman et al.•Talk in Action•2010

  • Talk at work

    John Heritage, Paul Drew•Talk at work•1992

  • Confrontation Talk

    I Hutchby•Confrontation Talk•2013

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • Wh-questions used as challenges

    Open Access•Irene Koshik•Discourse Studies•2003

  • Handbook of Discourse Analysis

    Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen et al.•Handbook of Discourse Analysis•2008

  • Crossfire

    Open Access•Faisal al-Kasim•Harvard International Journal of…•1999

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Grammar and Institution

    J Heritage, John C Heritage et al.•Research on Language and Social…•1995

  • Al-Jazeera

    L Carl Brown, Hugh Miles•Foreign Affairs•2005

  • A mess' and `rows

    Open Access•Marianna Patrona•Discourse & Communication•2009

  • Aggressiveness and deference in Arabic broadcast interviews

    Open Access•Abdulrahman Alfahad•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • Grammar and Social Organization

    G Raymond•American Sociological Review•2003

  • A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions

    Open Access•Irene Koshik•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Disagreements and third parties

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven E Clayman•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Answers and evasions

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven E Clayman•Language in Society•2001

  • Transformative answers

    Open Access•T Stivers, Makoto Hayashi•Language in Society•2010

  • A turn-taking system for British news interviews

    Open Access•David Greatbatch•Language in Society•1988

  • The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation

    Emanuel A Schegloff, Gail Jefferson et al.•Language•1977

  • Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews

    E Clayman, Steven E Clayman•Social Problems•1988

  • Equivocation in Arabic News Interviews

    Open Access•Abdulrahman Alfahad•Journal of Language and Social…•2016

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae