Doing focus group research
Studying rational ordering in focus group interaction
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5965189 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Laura Bang Lindegaard (0000-0002-1563-7077, Aalborg University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2014 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 629-644 |
| Data de publicação | 2014-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Discourse Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445614538563 |
| OpenAlex | W2045857689 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 48 |
Scholars of ethnomethodologically informed discourse studies are often sceptical of the use of interview data such as focus group data. Some scholars quite simply reject interview data with reference to a general preference for so-called naturally occurring data. Other scholars acknowledge that interview data can be of some use if the distinction between natural and contrived data is given up and replaced with a distinction between interview data as topic or as resource. In greater detail, such scholars argue that interview data are perfectly adequate if the researcher wants to study the topic of interview interaction, but inadequate as data for studying phenomena that go beyond the phenomenon of interview interaction. Neither of these more and less sceptical positions are, on the face of it, surprising due to the ethnomethodological commitment to study social order as accomplished in situ, not as something that pre-exists or goes beyond the situated interaction. This article, however, challenges not only the first, but also the second position and suggests that it is, after all, possible to do committedly ethnomethodological studies of focus group data that demonstrate how members of a focus group setting accomplish certain rational orders, and, significantly, how they do so by utilizing certain available resources
Conversation · Conversation analysis · Discourse analysis · Discursive psychology · Epistemology · Ethnomethodology · Focus group · Linguistics · Situated · Skepticism · Sociology · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Interpreting qualitative data
Talk and social structure
Analysing Everyday Explanation
Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action
Doing Conversation Analysis
The Spectacle of History
Focus Group Practice
Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview
Values and moral judgement
Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology
Sequence Organization in Interaction
Ontology or methodology
Ethnic solidarity as interactional accomplishment
Beyond armed camps
Depicting a Liminal Position in Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis and Membership Categorization Analysis
Natural Order
Order, order
The question–response system of Danish
Categorization and the moral order
Being dead and being there
Transcending the `natural'/`contrived' distinction
Enriching CA through MCA? Stokoe’s MCA keys
Membership categorization analysis
Moving forward by doing analysis
Natural' and `contrived' data
Questions of accountability
Moving forward with membership categorization analysis
Doing Data
Grammar and Social Organization
Asking elaborate questions
Critique and description
Social critique and the logic of description
A tutorial on membership categorization
Language and the sociology of mind
Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences
The reconsidered model of membership categorization analysis
The art(fulness) of open-ended interviewing
Harvey Sacks's Sociology of Mind in Action
Towards a Critical Ethnomethodology
Harvey Sacks's Primitive Natural Science
The Getting of Sexuality
Ethnomethodology and Marxism
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,56 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |