Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Expressing an alternative view from second position

Reversed polarity questions in everyday Japanese conversation

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5965693
AutoresHideyuki Sugiura (0000-0002-0867-0506, Setsunan University, autor de correspondencia)
Año2017
Volumen19
Número3
Páginas291-313
Fecha de publicación2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445617701813
OpenAlexW2607607690
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas33

This conversation-analytic study examines a type of action accomplished through a reversed polarity question (RPQ) responding to initial assessments in everyday Japanese conversation. This study demonstrates that RPQs deployed in this specific position express alternative views to initial assessments by appealing to participants’ common sense or knowledge and index participants’ epistemic symmetry over a particular assessable. These RPQs do not simply convey the speakers’ disagreement with initial assessments, however, but are designed to be situated as ‘new’ first assessments by triggering the conditional relevance of the question-answer adjacency pair, thereby inviting agreement from the prior speaker. This study also reveals two commonly observable practices by which the speaker secures the participants’ epistemic symmetry over a particular assessable and thereby creates the basis for producing RPQs. It is further shown that these two practices can affect the strength of disaffiliation expressed by the RPQ

Agreement · Cognitive psychology · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Epistemology · Linguistics · Situated · Communication · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • An interactional practice of registering expectation discrepancy

    Yuki Arita•Discourse Processes•2024

  • From interrogative to disaffiliative stance marker

    Open Access•Heeju Lee, Sung-Ock Sohn•Journal of Pragmatics•2022

  • Beyond Rhetorical Questions

    Irene Koshik•Beyond Rhetorical Questions•2005

  • Turn organization

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Interaction and Grammar•1996

  • Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement

    J Heritage•The language of turn and sequence•2002

  • A Comprehensive grammar of the English language

    Geoffrey N Leech, Jan Svartvik et al.•A Comprehensive grammar of the…•1985

  • The languages of Japan

    Shibatani Masayoshi•The languages of Japan•1990

  • Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction

    Open Access•T Stivers, L Mondada et al.•Morality of Knowledge in…•2011

  • Modified Repeats

    T Stivers•Research on Language and Social…•2005

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

  • Questions” in Argument Sequences in Japanese

    Open Access•Timothy Takagi, Tomoyo Takagi•Human Studies•1999

  • Japanese/Korean Linguistics

    Kyunghwan Kim, Noriko Akatsuka et al.•Language•1999

  • The Terms of Agreement

    Open Access•J Heritage, G Raymond•Social Psychology Quarterly•2005

  • Why do you ask

    Alice F Freed, Alice Freed et al.•"Why do you ask?"•2010

  • Questioning Presidents

    Open Access•E Clayman, Steven E Clayman et al.•Journal of Communication•2002

  • Question–response sequences in conversation across ten languages

    Open Access•N J Enfield, T Stivers et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • An overview of the question–response system in Japanese

    Open Access•Makoto Hayashi•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Marking a ‘noticing of departure’ in talk

    Open Access•Makoto Hayashi•Journal of Pragmatics•2009

  • Introducing direct complaints through questions

    Open Access•Chiara Maria Monzoni, Chiara Μ Monzoni•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Jakob Steensig, Paul Drew•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Using niin-interrogative to treat the prior speaker's action as an exaggeration

    Open Access•Mia Halonen, Marja-Leena Sorjonen•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Questions of accountability

    Open Access•T Heinemann•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Wh-interrogative formats used for questioning and beyond

    Open Access•Maria Egbert, Monika Vöge•Discourse Studies•2008

  • Concurrent operations on talk

    Open Access•Charles Goodwin, Marjorie Harness Goodwin•IPrA Papers in Pragmatics•2015

  • Interrogatives that seek no answers

    Open Access•Senko K Maynard•Linguistics•1995

  • A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which convey reversed polarity assertions

    Open Access•Irene Koshik•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • Transformative answers

    Open Access•T Stivers, Makoto Hayashi•Language in Society•2010

  • The Structure of the Japanese Language

    Noriko A Mccawley, Susumu Kuno•Language•1976

  • Pragmatics

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Pragmatics•1983

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año0,5
Intervalo de citas2022 - 2024 (3)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae