Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Look who’s talking now

A taxonomy of speakers in single-turn political discourse

Bibliographic Data

ID5966429
AuthorsAnna Ewa Wieczorek (0000-0003-4936-051X, University of Lodz, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume17
Issue3
Pages343-359
Publication date2015-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4456 • E-ISSN: 1461-7080
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1461445615571200
OpenAlexW2048534339
LanguageEN
References cited42

The aim of this article is to propose a taxonomy of speakers from a socio-pragmatic perspective by taking an original approach to the study of single-turn political discourse, that is, political speeches, rather than debates, interviews or press conferences. This limitation on the scope of the study stems from the fact that the categorisation advanced is not concerned with turn-taking, but concentrates on the speaker’s use of other voices in his/her representation of reality. Thus, a clear distinction is made between the speaker and the sayer, namely the original speaker whose words are reported, or rather creatively reconstructed, by the current speaker ‘here and now’. The taxomony comprises a number of categories employed strategically by the current speaker in the service of different objectives. The speaker categories are inherently limited due to a single principle of categorisation: the form of the report. The singular speaker is the default type which enables the speaker to present himself/herself as an individual as well as his/her attitudes, values and beliefs, while the collective speaker enhances the speaker’s belonging to a group and allows him/her to speak on behalf of its members. The sayer categories, by contrast, are more varied due to three independent principles of categorisation: the form of the report, the genuineness of the sayer’s utterance and the number of accounts embedded in the narrating event. The approach taken to the analysis of the narrative passages that involve the proposed speaker types owes much to Chilton’s Discourse Space Theory and is concerned with conceptualisation of the speaker’s representation of events from chosen perspective(s). The corpus of speeches selected to investigate and illustrate individual categories consists of over 80 political speeches delivered by three Democratic American Presidents: John Kennedy, William Clinton and Barack Obama

Epistemology · Indirect speech · Linguistics · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Reflexive pronoun · Sociology · Utterance · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Observations and speculations on subjectivity

    Ronald W Langacker•Iconicity in Syntax (Typological…•1985

  • Analysing Political Discourse

    Paul Chilton•Analysing Political Discourse•2004

  • Talking Voices

    Open Access•Deborah Tannen•Talking Voices•2007

  • Politicians and Rhetoric

    Open Access•Jonathan Charteris-Black, Jonathan Charteris‐black•Politicians and Rhetoric•2011

  • Evaluation in Text

    Geoffrey Thompson, Susan Hunston et al.•Evaluation in text•2000

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • Language and Social Identity

    John J Gumperz•Language and Social Identity•2009

  • Geometrical concepts at the interface of formal and cognitive models

    Paul Chilton•Pragmatics & Cognition•2007

  • Where Does Metonymy Stop? Senses, Facets, and Active Zones

    Cheryl Paradis•Metaphor and Symbol•2004

  • Quotation in Spoken English

    Patricia Mayes•Studies in Language•1990

  • Mire usted Sr. González … Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate

    Open Access•JoséLuis Blas Arroyo•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Interactional Positioning and Narrative Self-construction

    Wortham•Narrative Inquiry•2000

  • Speakers, Listeners and Communication

    Katarzyna M Jaszczolt, Gillian Brown•Language•1997

  • Rhetoric in Popular Culture

    Barry Brummett•College Composition and…•1995

  • Reported Speech in Chinese Political Discourse

    Open Access•Sai-Hua Kuo•Discourse Studies•2001

  • Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation

    Lieven Vandelanotte•WORD•2008

  • Embedded metapragmatics and lying politicians

    Open Access•Wortham, Stanton Wortham et al.•Language & Communication•1999

  • Represented perception

    Open Access•Laurel J Brinton, Laurel Brinton•Poetics•1980

  • A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse

    Open Access•Yael-Janette Zupnik•Journal of Pragmatics•1994

  • An analysis of speaker role inhabitance in narratives of personal experience

    Open Access•M Koven•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

  • EU discourse

    Open Access•Kjersti Fløttum•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • The fictions of language and the languages of fiction

    Open Access•Roger D Sell•Journal of Pragmatics•1995

  • Axiological aspects of proximization

    Open Access•Piotr Cap•Journal of Pragmatics•2010

  • Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse

    Open Access•Piotr Cap•Journal of Pragmatics•2008

  • Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation

    Open Access•Lieven Vandelanotte•Journal of Pragmatics•2004

  • Poetics and Performances as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life

    Richard Bauman, Charles L Briggs•Annual Review of Anthropology•1990

  • Explorations in the Deictic Field

    William F Hanks•Current Anthropology•2005

  • Pragmatics

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Pragmatics•1983

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae