Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Revenue–expenditure nexus of Indian states

Panel ARDL approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6005857
AuthorsHimani Baxi (0000-0002-4034-679X, Pandit Deendayal Energy University), Dhyani Mehta (0000-0002-6783-0506, Pandit Deendayal Energy University)
Year2025
Volume52
Issue11
Pages1628-1642
Publication date2025-10-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0306-8293 • E-ISSN: 1758-6712
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/ijse-03-2024-0232
OpenAlexW4407209109
LanguageEN
References cited61

Purpose In India’s federal system, rising expenditure responsibilities and limited tax-raising powers challenge states’ fiscal stability. Analyzing the short- and long-term revenue–expenditure nexus and identifying fiscal consolidation strategies is crucial to managing fiscal deficits effectively. Design/methodology/approach The present study delves into the short- and long-term causal relationships between state expenditures and taxes, utilizing panel data from 29 Indian states. The use of panel autoregressive distributed lag. Findings The estimates confirm that the growth of state government spending and state government income (state gross domestic product) positively impacts state government taxes. Therefore, these findings lend support to the spend-tax hypothesis, both in the short run and long run. The estimates of spend-tax causality also suggest that states may not necessarily need to be concerned about controlling their expenditure and increasing fiscal deficits. Practical implications States in India can garner the necessary financial resources through either their own taxes or their share in central taxes to fulfill their expenditure needs. This, indeed, is an advantage of the federal system. Originality/value The outcomes of this investigation also prompt the necessity for a fresh assessment of the spend-tax hypothesis utilizing the variables of state expenditure and states’ owned tax income, excluding any form of central transfers. This study can be further added to the literature on causal link between expenditure and states’ own revenue in India and also reevaluate the progression of fiscal decentralization in the country. Peer review The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-03-2024-0232

Development economics · Econometrics · Economics · Macroeconomics · Monetary economics · Panel data · Revenue · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Finance

  • Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•M Hashem Pesaran, Ron Smith•Journal of Econometrics•1995

  • The local power of some unit root tests for panel data

    Jorg Breitung•Nonstationary panels, panel…•2004

  • Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes

    Open Access•Hiro Y Toda, Taku Yamamoto•Journal of Econometrics•1995

  • Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism

    Open Access•Wallace E Oates•International Tax and Public…•2005

  • The saving and investment nexus for China

    Paresh Kumar Narayan•Applied Economics•2005

  • Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•Elena-Ivona Dumitrescu, Christophe Hurlin•Economic Modelling•2012

  • General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels

    Open Access•M Hashem Pesaran•SSRN Electronic Journal•2004

  • Unit root tests in panel data

    Open Access•Andrew Levin, Andrew T Levin et al.•Journal of Econometrics•2002

  • Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•Kyung So Im, M Hashem Pesaran et al.•Journal of Econometrics•2003

  • Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels

    M Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin et al.•Journal of the American…•1999

  • Testing for a unit root in time series regression

    Peter C B Phillips, Pierre Perron•Biometrika•1988

  • Panel Cointegration

    Peter Pedroni•Econometric Theory•2004

  • Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data

    Open Access•Chihwa Kao•Journal of Econometrics•1999

  • An Essay on Fiscal Federalism

    Wallace E Oates•Journal of Economic Literature•1999

  • Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root

    David A Dickey, Wayne A Fuller•Journal of the American…•1979

  • Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax

    George M Von Furstenberg, R Jeffery Green et al.•The Review of Economics and…•1986

  • The Relationship Between Revenue and Expenditure in the Asean Countries

    Open Access•Cosimo Magazzino•East Asia•2014

  • Causality and comovement between taxes and expenditures

    Open Access•John Baffes, Anwar Shah•Journal of Development Economics•1994

  • Second generation fiscal federalism

    Open Access•Barry R Weingast•Journal of Urban Economics•2009

  • The tax-spend debate

    Open Access•James E Payne•Public Choice•1998

  • Expenditures and receipts

    Open Access•Michael L Marlow, Neela Manage•Public Choice•1987

  • A Rational Theory of the Size of Government

    Allan H Meltzer, Scott F Richard•Journal of Political Economy•1981

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae