The Contribution of Collective Landownership to China’s Economic Transition and Rural Industrialization
A Resource Allocation Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6007972 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiaolin Pei (0000-0003-1306-4604, Lund University, Sweden Leiden University, The Netherlands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 279-314 |
| Publication date | 2002-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern China (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-7004 • E-ISSN: 1552-6836 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00900402028003001 |
| OpenAlex | W1975406680 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 14 |
The high growth of outputs of township and village enterprises (TVEs)1 is a remarkable feature of China's transition to a market economy. Therefore, many researchers regard TVEs as the major force driving China's high growth and its transition. They hotly debate the reasons for TVEs' growth, supplying various explanations of why China's transition has been more successful than that of the East European countries. These explanations (e.g., Oi, 1992; N. Lin, 1995; Che and Qian, 1998) fall into two schools, exemplified by the debate between Andrew Walder (1995) and Victor Nee (1992): one emphasizes statism and the other neoclassical liberalism. The debate considers nothing outside the state market, and neither side believes in the existence of a third alternative. While Walder claims that local governments that directly control the collective TVEs act as efficient industrial firms, Nee argues that the organizational form of TVEs-a hybrid between state and private ownership-makes them more efficient than state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China's mixed economy
China · Common ownership · Corporatism · Development economics · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Industrialisation · Market economy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Statism · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Land Rights and Reforms · Law
Path-dependent institutional change to collective land rights
From Privatization to Deindustrialization
Territorialization of urban villages in China
How does rural homestead influence the hukou transfer intention of rural-urban migrants in China
Rural development led by autonomous village land cooperatives
Property Rights Reforms and Changing Grassroots Governance in China’s Urban—Rural Peripheries
Redefining Rural Collectives in China
Fragmented Peri-urbanisation Led by Autonomous Village Development under Informal Institution in High-density Regions
Struggling Foreign Small- and Medium-Sized Factories in Coastal China
The Genesis of China's Economic Transition
Urban Village Shareholding
From Local State Corporatism to Land Revenue Regime
From South Africa to China
Hukouand land
Chinese Township-Village Enterprises as Vaguely Defined Cooperatives
The Political Economy of Chinese Development
The Peasant Family and Rural Development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350-1988
Organizational Dynamics of Market Transition
Insecure Property Rights and Government Ownership of Firms
Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour
Rural Population, Institutions and China's Economic Transformation
The Property Right Paradigm
A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth
Fiscal Reform and the Economic Foundations of Local State Corporatism in China
Local Governments as Industrial Firms
Local market socialism
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2005 - 2021 (17) |
| Highly cited | No |