From a Hierarchy in Time to a Hierarchy in Space

The Meanings of Sino-Babylonianism in Early Twentieth-Century China

Bibliographic Data

ID6008366
AuthorsTze-Ki Hon (0000-0003-2503-0479, State University of New York at Geneseo, Geneseo, NY, USA,, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume36
Issue2
Pages139-169
Publication date2010-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0097-7004 • E-ISSN: 1552-6836
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0097700409345126
OpenAlexW2046580265
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited25

In 1892, Terrien de Lacouperie (1845—1894), professor of Chinese at University College in London, set out to prove that the Chinese migrated from Mesopotamia in prehistoric times. Despite mixed responses from his colleagues, Lacouperie’s “Sino-Babylonianism” found its way into China and captured the imagination of Chinese historians from the 1900s to 1930s. Whether they supported or opposed Lacouperie’s view, Chinese historians were intrigued by his boldness in linking early China to the global network of trade and cultural exchange. This article examines how Chinese historians adopted, transformed, and appropriated Sino-Babylonianism in their discourse on the nation. It argues that the rise and fall of Sino-Babylonianism coincided with the Chinese perceptions of the world system of nation-states. Sino-Babylonianism was warmly received when the Chinese perceived the world system of nation-states as a hierarchy in temporality, prescribing a process of evolution that all human communities must follow. Sino-Babylonianism was fiercely rejected when the Chinese saw the world system of nation-states as a hierarchy in space, characterized by incessant territorial expansion of imperialist powers. In both instances, Sino-Babylonianism was no longer what Lacouperie had proposed in the late nineteenth century. Rather, it was an important benchmark for the Chinese understanding of the modern global order

China · Epistemology · Hierarchy · Modernization theory · Order (exchange · Political science · Sinology · Sociology · Temporality · Chinese history and philosophy · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub