Small towns taking different climate change adaptation paths
Challenging the Dominant Leadership Paradigm
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6014309 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wolfgang Haupt (0000-0002-1042-2106, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, corresponding author), Nicole Mitchell (0000-0001-6783-5801), Carolin Herdtle (0009-0006-6954-3910), Julia Teebken (0000-0002-8074-2789, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 473-488 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographica Helvetica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7312 • E-ISSN: 2194-8798 |
| Publisher | Copernicus Publications (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.5194/gh-80-473-2025 |
| OpenAlex | W7106708176 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Mainstream discourses on urban climate adaptation leaders have focused on large and medium-sized cities. Drawing from the urban governance literature, we identify four leadership characteristics: (1) structural advantage, (2) high levels of institutionalised climate policy, (3) showcase projects, and (4) visibility of adaptation actions to the outside world (domestic and international). To develop a leadership typology for small towns, we systematically compare these characteristics with climate adaptation efforts in two small towns in Germany. The chosen municipalities developed adaptation approaches within the scope of a third-party-funded project. A mixed-methods design was developed to examine their adaptation activities. Our findings reveal that small towns, despite the lack of structural advantage, were successful in pioneering participatory adaptation action that is anchored in the everyday lives and lived experiences of residents. Some institutional mainstreaming did occur into existing administrative structures, whereas showcasing was not as important. Instead, exchanging knowledge with other small-town peers over challenges and how to develop hands-on solutions were considered more important. In this sense, small towns have proven highly creative in their efforts to implement adaptation action with few formal resources. Small towns take very different paths to tackle climate adaptation locally than mainstream adaptation leaders, who often follow a more institutionalised strategic path of adaptation planning. Given the growing need for mixed adaptation (a combination of planned and self-organized adaptation), small towns could serve as catalysts for initiating this process from the bottom up, anchoring it in everyday adaptation. In the context of imperfect conditions, small towns have the potential to significantly enhance our understanding of what constitutes “leadership
Action (physics · Adaptation (eye · Climate change adaptation · Climate justice · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Mainstream · Mainstreaming · Typology
Vulnerability and Capacity
Tales of transforming cities
Climate change adaptation networks for small and medium-sized cities
How do local factors shape transformation pathways towards climate-neutral and resilient cities
Green city branding or achieving sustainable urban development? Reflections of two winning cities of the European Green Capital Award
Climate change and healthy ageing
The development of local knowledge orders
From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure
Intentionality and visibility in state- and society-led climate approaches
Dichotomy or continuum? A global review of the interaction between autonomous and planned adaptations
Examining the dynamics of social cohesion
Labs in the Real World
Real-World Laboratories - the Road to Transdisciplinary Research
Climate change adaptation with limited resources
Unlikely pioneers
Upscaling climate change adaptation in small- and medium-sized municipalities
Leaders and Laggards
Spectacular, realisable and ‘everyday’
Climate policy at the local level
Vulnerability locked in. On the need to engage the outside of the adaptation box
From Planning to Implementation? The Role of Climate Change Adaptation Plans to Tackle Heat Stress
Building up resilience in cities worldwide – Rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme
Building actor-centric transformative capacity through city-university partnerships
What can city leaders do for climate change? Insights from the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group network
Framing different energy futures? Comparing Fridays for Future and Extinction Rebellion in Germany
Sustainable imaginaries and the green roof on Chicago’s City Hall
Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge
How Do Local Policy Makers Learn about Climate Change Adaptation Policies? Examining Study Visits as an Instrument of Policy Learning in the European Union
Cities, Europeanization and Multi‐level Governance
Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance
Walking the Talk
Study tours and inter-city policy learning
Climate pioneership and leadership in structurally disadvantaged maritime port cities
Mainstreaming ecosystem-based adaptation
Follow the Policy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |