Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Administrative guidelines as a source of immigration law

Bibliographic Data

ID6015352
AuthorsLarissa Vetters (0000-0002-3408-4850, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume3
Issue2
Pages70-90
Publication date2019-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Legal Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-9584 • E-ISSN: 1758-9576
PublisherBerghahn Books (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3167/jla.2019.030205
OpenAlexW3012005277
LanguageEN
Citations received11

This article makes a conceptual and methodological argument for ethnographically studying a certain type of paperwork in immigration bureaucracies, namely internal administrative guidelines. Much ethnographic research has focused on case files, application forms, identity documents and judicial decisions attempting to shed light on bureaucrats’ discretionary power and migrants’ strategies of navigating immigration laws. This article shifts attention from bureaucrats’ discretionary practices to their efforts to standardise and codify their own practices. The administrative guidelines of the Foreigners’ Registration Office of Berlin and the visa guidelines of the Federal Foreign Office of Germany are examined as legal documents that are produced in a web of textually grounded legal meanings, as well as in a meshwork of social and political relations and in turn reconfigure both social relations and legal meanings. Contextualised in such a way, these administrative guidelines shed light not only on ‘immigration law at work’ but also on ‘immigration law in the making

Administrative law · Argument (complex analysis · Bureaucracy · Ethnography · Identity (music · Immigration · Immigration law · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Sociology · Consumer behavior in food and health · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Public Administration

  • The getting and granting of citizenship

    Open Access•Hannah Bliersbach•New Community•2026

  • La (re)définition des mobilités privilégiées par l’administration

    Open Access•Carla Mascia•Lien social et Politiques•2025

  • “Don’t Tell Them What You Told Me”

    Open Access•Judy Kalman, Patricia Valdivia et al.•Written Communication•2023

  • Socio-legal perspectives on the rule of law

    Eva Kocher, Marta Bucholc et al.•Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie•2022

  • Digital-Algorithmic Urban Governmentality

    Weejun Park•International Area Studies Review•2025

  • Failing, writing, litigating

    Open Access•Sophie Andreetta•International Journal of Law in…•2022

  • Asylum Adjudication and Street-Level Discretion

    Open Access•Jonathan Miaz•Journal of Comparative Policy…•2024

  • Mobility cause lawyering

    Open Access•Ignacio Fradejas-García, Kristín Loftsdóttir•Critique of Anthropology•2024

  • Governing Access to Nationality Through Paperwork

    Open Access•D Sredanovic, Émilien Fargues•Social Policy and Administration•2024

  • To Comply or Not to Comply, That Is the Question

    Open Access•Carla Mascia•Social Policy and Administration•2025

  • The making of procedural justice

    Sophie Andreetta, Larissa Vetters et al.•Citizenship Studies•2022

Citations per year2.75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae