Partners Mirror Each Other's Informal Helping Behavior
Evidence From a Longitudinal Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6015477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marlou Jm Ramaekers (0000-0002-6951-1461, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands), Marieke Voorpostel (0000-0003-0653-9827, Swiss Centre for Expertise in the Social Sciences (FORS) Lausanne Switzerland) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 848-858 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Marriage and the Family (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-2445 • E-ISSN: 1741-3737 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jomf.70034 |
| OpenAlex | W4415651015 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
Objective This paper examines to what extent partners' informal helping behaviors are related and to what extent this partner effect differs by gender. Differences in informal help given to kin and non‐kin are explored. Background Although prior research has suggested that partners influence each other's helping behavior, these mostly cross‐sectional studies did not account for possible selection effects. The present study takes a longitudinal approach to examine whether the partner's helping behavior changes informal helping over time, thereby diminishing the impact of selection and allowing for a more stringent test of partner influence. Method Using three waves of dyadic data from the Swiss Household Panel (2013, 2016, and 2019) ( N = 9666), we employ fixed‐effects logistic regression analysis to eliminate between‐person differences. To facilitate interpretation of the effects, we estimate average logit elasticities. Results People have a higher likelihood of providing informal help when their partner engages in informal helping. This relationship did not differ between men and women but was stronger for help to kin than for help to non‐kin. Conclusion Findings suggest that the relationship between partners' informal helping behavior is not solely due to selection effects but is at least partly the result of partners changing their helping behavior to resemble each other more over time. New questions surface about differences between helping kin and non‐kin
Altruism and Prosocial Behavior, Sociology of
Fixed Effects Regression Models
Participation in formal and informal volunteering
A critique of the cross-lagged panel model.
Youth Religious Involvement and Adult Community Participation
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Are Homeowners Better Citizens? Homeownership and Community Participation in the United States
The Enduring Influence of Parent's Voluntary Involvement on Their Children's Volunteering in Later Life
Decline in informal helping during the first Covid-19 lockdown
Making or Breaking Informal Volunteering
Personality and Social Network Involvement as Predictors of Helping Behavior in Everyday Life
How Social Processes Distort Measurement
Reciprocity and volunteering
Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of Volunteer Work
The Third Shift
Mine, Yours and Ours
Asymmetric Fixed-effects Models for Panel Data
Men's Caregiving
Intergenerational Transmission of Volunteering
Volunteering
Intermarriage and Homogamy
A longitudinal dyadic analysis of gender ideology during the transition into parenthood
Longitudinal Dyad Models in Family Research
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |