Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Domed or flat? The case study of Building 21 at Kiçik Tepe (Middle Kura Valley, Azerbaijan) and a reconsideration of the Neolithic roofing architecture in the South Caucasus

Bibliographic Data

ID6016521
AuthorsEmmanuel Baudouin (0000-0001-6644-215X, Travaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, les Espaces et les Sociétés), Alexia Decaix (0000-0002-0637-165X, Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès), Emmanuela Brunacci (Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès), Farhad Guliyev (0000-0003-1994-4776, Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès), Giulio Palumbi (Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès)
Year2022
Volume48-2
Issue48-2
Pages65-90
Publication date2022-10-24
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePaléorient (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0153-9345 • E-ISSN: 1957-701X
PublisherOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/paleorient.2129
OpenAlexW4318423066
LanguageEN
References cited35

The site of Kiçik Tepe (Azerbaijan) is located in the Middle Kura Valley river. The archaeological material and radiocarbon dating attribute the oldest levels to the Neolithic period (5870-5750 BCE), and its circular architecture is characteristic of the Aratashen-Shulaveri-Shomu culture. The 2018-2019 excavation campaigns have unearthed Building 21, which was built with mud bricks and preserved over 1.4 m in height. The exceptional state of preservation of the building is due to a fire that led to the collapse of the walls and roof materials. Based on the archaeological results of the excavation and a multidisciplinary research combining a stratigraphic examination, an architectural study and an anthracological analysis, this paper proposes to reconstruct the elevation and the roof of Building 21. In addition, our questions will focus on a possible diversity of forms and roofing techniques in the Neolithic period as perceived in the archaeological literature. We also want to understand what factors (environmental, cultural, socio-cultural) may influence choices regarding roofing and whether they can be identified through archaeological evidence. This paper contributes to the current debate on the technical specificities developed by these communities with new data and thus to a better understanding of architecture in its three dimensions, to define the complexities linking cultural "behaviours", building materials and architectural solutions among these Neolithic communities

Archaeology · Art · Excavation · Geography · Period (music · Roof · Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Marine and environmental studies · Architecture

  • Excavations at Tall Arpachiyah, 1933

    M E L Mallowan, Jo Rose et al.•Iraq•1935

  • The Neolithic Settlement of Aknashen (Ararat valley, Armenia)

    Ruben Sergeevič ca /21 Jh Badaljan, A A Harutyunyan et al.•Neolithic Settlement of Aknashen•2022

  • Communities of Practice

    Open Access•Etienne Wenger•Communities of Practice•1998

  • New data and perspectives on the early stages of the Neolithic in the Middle Kura River Valley (South Caucasus). The 2017–2019 excavations at Kiçik Tepe, Western Azerbaijan

    Open Access•Giulio Palumbi, Farhad Guliyev et al.•Archaeological Research in Asia•2021

  • Mud-bricks in Neolithic architecture at Göytepe

    Y Nishiaki, Farhad Guliyev et al.•Göytepe•2021

  • The pottery of Aknashen

    A A Harutyunyan, Armine Harutyunyan•Neolithic Settlement of Aknashen•2022

  • The Archaeology of the Caucasus

    Antonio Sagona•Archaeology of the Caucasus•2017

  • L’architecture de Mésopotamie et du Caucase de la fin du 7 e à la fin du 5 e millénaire

    Emmanuel Baudouin•Larchitecture de Mésopotamie et…•2021

  • Investigating Cultural and Socioeconomic Change at the Beginning of the Pottery Neolithic in the Southern Caucasus

    Y Nishiaki, Farhad Guliyev et al.•Bulletin of the American Schools…•2015

  • Neolithic residential patterns in the southern Caucasus

    Open Access•Y Nishiaki, Farhad Guliyev et al.•Quaternary International•2018

  • Mentesh Tepe, an early settlement of the Shomu-Shulaveri Culture in Azerbaijan

    Open Access•Bertille Lyonnet, Farhad Guliyev et al.•Quaternary International•2016

  • Vegetation and plant exploitation at Mentesh Tepe (Azerbaijan), 6th–3rd millennium BC initial results of the archaeobotanical study

    Open Access•Alexia Decaix, Erwan Messager et al.•Quaternary International•2016

  • The Mesolithic-Neolithic interface in the Southern Caucasus

    Open Access•Y Nishiaki, Azad Zeynalov et al.•Archaeological Research in Asia•2019

  • Geoarchaeological and palaeobotanical evidence for prehistoric cereal storage in the southern Caucasus

    Open Access•Seiji Kadowaki, Lisa Maher et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2014

  • The Earliest Agricultural Settlements in the Territory of Azerbaidzhan

    I G Narimanov•Soviet Anthropology and Archeology•1992

  • Beyond Ethnic Boundaries

    Open Access•Melchisedek Chétima•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2019

  • New light on the Late Prehistory of the South Caucasus

    Catherine Marro, Veli Bakhshaliyev et al.•Paléorient•2019

  • Rethinking architectural techniques of the Southern Caucasus in the 6th millennium BC

    Emmanuel Baudouin•Paléorient•2019

  • The changing face of clay

    Open Access•David Wengrow•Antiquity•1998

  • [Beehive] Villages of North Syria

    Open Access•Paul W Copeland, P Copeland•Antiquity•1955

  • Le sens pratique

    Pierre Bourdieu•1980

  • The Origins of the Village Revisited

    Open Access•Kent V Flannery•American Antiquity•2002

  • Vernacular architecture in eastern Senegal

    Open Access•Thomas Pelmoine, Anne Mayor•Journal of Material Culture•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae