Hybridity and Transformation

During the early twentieth century, strong nationalistic ideas sprang up in Indonesia. Some Chinese elites in professional positions under the Dutch colonial government tended to side with the Dutch with the pro-Dutch attitude; some working for Chinese newspapers or agencies developed the pro-China stance; some supported and cooperated with the indigenous people with the pro-independence tendency; and others had their inclinations transformed over the course of time. After examining the life history of a few prominent Chinese figures, this article shows that three levels of factors—international politics in East Asia, local politics in the Dutch East Indies, and their life histories under Dutch rule (together with travel experience to China)—were critical for each Chinese person in establishing or transforming their often hybrid political orientations. The Chinese preference was neither monolithic nor settled, so the general assumption that “Chinese people are loyal to China” in Indonesian politics of the colonial era should be revised

China · Colonialism · East Asia · Government (linguistics · Hybridity · Independence (probability theory · Indigenous · Indonesian · Newspaper · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Anthropology · Asian Studies and History · Gender Studies · History · Law · Railway Systems and Materials Science

• Prominent Indonesian Chinese

  Leo Suryadinata•Prominent Indonesian Chinese•2015

  Add to list