An appraisal of the drivers behind South Africa and China relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6030360 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Butholezwe Mtombeni (0000-0002-0370-6856, Nelson Mandela University, corresponding author), Oliver Mtapuri (0000-0001-7698-9482, University of KwaZulu-Natal) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 794-810 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Identities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1472-5843 • E-ISSN: 1472-5851 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14725843.2022.2125364 |
| OpenAlex | W4297998899 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 18 |
The relationship between South Africa and China has not reached its full potential but has gathered great impetus and simultaneously stirred up controversy. Two important issues that have arisen concerning this relationship are whether the engagements between the two countries are mutually beneficial or asymmetrically favour one country over the other. This paper interrogates South Africa-China relations between 2009 and 2019, an epoch in which the relationship between the two nations became convoluted as much for what it entailed as for what it excluded. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants, and the information that was gathered was supplemented with a review of the literature within the context of the relationship. We found that South Africa-China relations go beyond the issues of minerals and other related natural resources. We also found that while there are elements of asymmetry in this relationship in economic terms, this asymmetry is somewhat exaggerated. We, therefore, recommend that regardless of this exaggeration, South Africa must place itself in a position to define terms of engagement with China and put in place measures to demarcate such perceived asymmetry
China · Development economics · Economics · Exaggeration · Geography · Political science · Sociology · International Development and Aid · Law · Psychology · South African History and Culture
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis
Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research
China in Africa
The emergence of the BRICS – implications for global governance
East-West/North-South – or Imperial-Subimperial? The BRICS, Global Governance and Capital Accumulation
South African foreign policy and China
Perspectives on South-South relations
Sub-imperialism as Lubricant of Neoliberalism
South Africa's Economic Transformation since 1994
Using thematic analysis in psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |