Fixity, the discourse of efficiency, and enclosure in the Sahelian land ‘reserve
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6030584 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erin Kitchell (University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 110-123 |
| Publication date | 2014-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Identities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1472-5843 • E-ISSN: 1472-5851 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14725843.2013.868675 |
| OpenAlex | W1966584768 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
The spate of foreign investments in land in developing countries in recent years has sparked speculation about trends in agriculture in developing countries, including the nature of land consolidation and the tradeoffs between food sovereignty and export-oriented growth. Consistent with policy favoring mechanization, irrigation, and chemical inputs, the economy of scale and access to infrastructure provided by large concessions is viewed as a means to overcome biophysical production constraints. Domestic officials legitimize large concessions through references to stores of available ‘idle’ and ‘marginal’ land. However, this raises important questions about the historical track records of modern management techniques as well as existing claims on these lands. Low productivity areas are heavily used by pastoralists as extensive grazing tracts, but these lands have historically been viewed as an agricultural reserve. In the Sahel, policy discourse around large-scale leases has a long history that can be traced back to mise en valeur clauses that defined productivity solely in terms of agricultural output. This represents a consistent undervaluing of the economic and ecological contributions of pastoral production, prompting agricultural expansion and fragmentation of rangelands. Land reforms and land-use policies are underpinned by particular narratives of efficiency and long-held assumptions of degradation through overgrazing. Strategies promoting irrigation, mechanization, and large-scale farming have weakened symbiotic links between rangelands and croplands. Increased privatization and commodification of land will exacerbate the problem. Cases from Sudan and Mali reveal an increasingly rigid enforcement of fixed boundaries around the leases disrupting local livelihoods' use of movement and secondary claims on land to cope with climatic variability
Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Land grabbing · Land tenure · Livelihood · Natural resource economics · Overgrazing · Productivity · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · Animal Diversity and Health Studies · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Ecology
Transitions
Managing Mobility in African Rangelands
Sustainable adaptation
The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture
Policy, environment and development in African rangelands
Field expansion and reallocation in the Sahel – land use pattern dynamics in a fluctuating biophysical and socio-economic environment
Sahel pastoralists
The New Pastoral Development Paradigm
Agricultural land use pattern dynamics in the Sudan–Sahel—towards an event-driven framework
"Political ecology and the moral dimensions of "resource conflicts
Vulnerability of Worldwide Pastoralism to Global Changes and Interdisciplinary Strategies for Sustainable Pastoralism
Constructing Locality
Customary vs Private Property Rights? Dynamics and Trajectories of Vernacular Land Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa
The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change
Methodological Reflections on the Use of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Science in Human Ecological Research
Changing Access to Labor, Pastures, and Knowledge
Sudden Shift or Migratory Drift? FulBe Herd Movements to the Sudano-Guinean Region of West Africa
| Highly cited | No |
|---|