Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An analysis of impoliteness as the oppositional discourse in the Nigerian #EndSars protest

Bibliographic Data

ID6030731
AuthorsChioma Juliet Ikechukwu-Ibe (University of Salerno, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume23
Issue1
Pages128-144
Publication date2025-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAfrican Identities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1472-5843 • E-ISSN: 1472-5851
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14725843.2023.2227355
OpenAlexW4381855589
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited48

This study investigates the possible application of impoliteness strategies to discourse on the 2020 Nigerian #EndSARS protest on Twitter. Examining impoliteness strategies employed in tweets and comments on the #EndSARS protest in Nigeria, identifying the most used impoliteness strategy(ies) and contextualising identified strategies remain the study’s preoccupation. The data, drawn from 350 tweets to 100 tweets and 250 comments with the hashtag #EndSARS, are descriptively analysed based on the tenets of Culpeper’s anatomy of impoliteness. The findings of the study reveal the presence of five impoliteness strategies in tweets and comments with the hashtag #EndSARS with no manifestation of off-record impoliteness. It is found that face threatening acts (FTAs) are both culture- and context-specific; membership categorisation and impoliteness strategies especially bald-on-record and negative impoliteness work hand in hand to produce the full effect. The study establishes further that the interplay of prior knowledge and actual situation knowledge gives rise to bald-on-record impoliteness while also noting that conjunctions, adverbs, and modal auxiliary verbs depending on their manner of application are capable of triggering impoliteness. The study, therefore, concludes that context, together with turns preceding and succeeding any turn construction unit (TCU), are strong determinants of impoliteness in any discourse

Linguistics · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Digital activism and collective resistance to police brutality

    Open Access•Emma Etim, Jacob Olufemi Fatile et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Feminist agency and the Nigerian press framing of women’s participation in the #EndSars protest

    Tordue Simon Targema, Fatima D Vakkai•Feminist Media Studies•2026

  • It will never be well with Sars’

    Open Access•Sopuruchi Christian Aboh•Discourse & Society•2023

  • Navigating Online Fandom via Impoliteness and Politeness Strategies in Premier League Football Banter Tweets in Nigeria

    Open Access•Samuel Babatunde, Orija Temidayo et al.•Journal of Asian and African…•2026

  • Discursive tropes of youth activism in the tweets of virtual #EndSars protesters

    Omolade Ilesanmi•African Identities•2025

  • Intercultural communication

    Ronald Scollon, Suzanne B K Scollon et al.•Intercultural communication•1995

  • On Face-Work

    Erving Goffman•Interaction Ritual•2017

  • Impoliteness in Interaction

    Dan Bousfield, Derek Bousfield•Impoliteness in interaction•2008

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Richard J Watts•Politeness•2003

  • Impoliteness

    Open Access•Jonathan Culpeper•Impoliteness•2011

  • ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation

    Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff•Education in Medicine Journal•2019

  • Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities

    Open Access•Gunther Eysenbach, J E Till•BMJ•2001

  • Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments

    Open Access•Donald A Cook, David A Cook et al.•The American Journal of Medicine•2006

  • Qualitative and descriptive research

    Open Access•Hossein Nassaji•Language Teaching Research•2015

  • Content validity in psychological assessment

    Stephen N Haynes, David C S Richard et al.•Psychological Assessment•1995

  • Chapter 4. Relational work and impoliteness

    Michael A Locher, Miriam A Locher et al.•Impoliteness in Language•2008

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Lectures on Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks•Lectures on conversation•1995

  • Impoliteness in Language

    Dan Bousfield, Derek Bousfield et al.•Impoliteness in Language•2008

  • Pragmatic Analysis of Presidential Campaign Manifestos of Muhammadu Buhari and Donald Trump

    Open Access•Chioma Juliet Ikechukwu-Ibe, Sopuruchi Christian Aboh et al.•Theory and Practice in Language…•2021

  • Impoliteness and power dynamics in intimate interactions

    Open Access•Lina Mourad•Language and Literature…•2021

  • Giving a Dog a Bad Name

    E Mensah, Samson Fabian Nzuanke et al.•Communicatio•2022

  • Activating, seeking, and creating common ground

    Istvan Kecskes, Fenghui Zhang•Pragmatics & Cognition•2009

  • ‘No diga chorradas…’ la descortesía en el debate político cara a cara. Una aproximación pragma-variacionista

    Open Access•José Luis Blas-Arroyo, José Luis Blas Arroyo•Oralia análisis del discurso oral•2001

  • Twitter and the Real Academia Española

    Dale A Koike, Víctor Garre-León et al.•Journal of Politeness Research•2021

  • Impoliteness in reader comments on the Al-Jazeera channel news website

    Ghaleb Rabab''Ah, Nusiebah Alali•Journal of Politeness Research•2019

  • Impoliteness in children's interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice

    Holly R Cashman•Journal of Politeness Research•2006

  • Informed consent and secondary data

    Open Access•Nadia Von Benzon•Area•2019

  • The Role of Digital Technology in the EndSars Protest in Nigeria During Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Prince Chiagozie Ekoh, Elizabeth Onyedikachi George•Journal of Human Rights and…•2021

  • The role of prosody and gesture in the perception of mock impoliteness

    Sean Mckinnon, Pilar Prieto•Journal of Politeness Research•2014

  • Politeness

    Open Access•Penelope Brown, C Levinson et al.•Politeness•1987

  • The Pragmatics of Politeness

    Geoffrey Leech•The Pragmatics of Politeness•2014

  • Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show

    Jonathan Culpeper•Journal of Politeness Research•2005

  • Impoliteness in EFL

    Open Access•Agus Wijayanto, Aryati Prasetyarini et al.•SAGE Open•2017

  • Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions

    Open Access•Michael Haugh•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • Ethics as Methods

    Open Access•A N Markham, K Tiidenberg et al.•Social Media + Society•2018

  • Rudeness at 911 Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack

    Open Access•Karen Tracy, Sarah J Tracy•Human Communication Research•1998

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae