An analysis of impoliteness as the oppositional discourse in the Nigerian #EndSars protest
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6030731 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chioma Juliet Ikechukwu-Ibe (University of Salerno, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 128-144 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | African Identities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1472-5843 • E-ISSN: 1472-5851 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14725843.2023.2227355 |
| OpenAlex | W4381855589 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 48 |
This study investigates the possible application of impoliteness strategies to discourse on the 2020 Nigerian #EndSARS protest on Twitter. Examining impoliteness strategies employed in tweets and comments on the #EndSARS protest in Nigeria, identifying the most used impoliteness strategy(ies) and contextualising identified strategies remain the study’s preoccupation. The data, drawn from 350 tweets to 100 tweets and 250 comments with the hashtag #EndSARS, are descriptively analysed based on the tenets of Culpeper’s anatomy of impoliteness. The findings of the study reveal the presence of five impoliteness strategies in tweets and comments with the hashtag #EndSARS with no manifestation of off-record impoliteness. It is found that face threatening acts (FTAs) are both culture- and context-specific; membership categorisation and impoliteness strategies especially bald-on-record and negative impoliteness work hand in hand to produce the full effect. The study establishes further that the interplay of prior knowledge and actual situation knowledge gives rise to bald-on-record impoliteness while also noting that conjunctions, adverbs, and modal auxiliary verbs depending on their manner of application are capable of triggering impoliteness. The study, therefore, concludes that context, together with turns preceding and succeeding any turn construction unit (TCU), are strong determinants of impoliteness in any discourse
Linguistics · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology
Digital activism and collective resistance to police brutality
Feminist agency and the Nigerian press framing of women’s participation in the #EndSars protest
It will never be well with Sars’
Navigating Online Fandom via Impoliteness and Politeness Strategies in Premier League Football Banter Tweets in Nigeria
Discursive tropes of youth activism in the tweets of virtual #EndSars protesters
Intercultural communication
On Face-Work
Impoliteness in Interaction
Politeness
Impoliteness
ABC of Content Validation and Content Validity Index Calculation
Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities
Current Concepts in Validity and Reliability for Psychometric Instruments
Qualitative and descriptive research
Content validity in psychological assessment
Chapter 4. Relational work and impoliteness
Logic and Conversation
Lectures on Conversation
Impoliteness in Language
Pragmatic Analysis of Presidential Campaign Manifestos of Muhammadu Buhari and Donald Trump
Impoliteness and power dynamics in intimate interactions
Giving a Dog a Bad Name
Activating, seeking, and creating common ground
‘No diga chorradas…’ la descortesía en el debate político cara a cara. Una aproximación pragma-variacionista
Twitter and the Real Academia Española
Impoliteness in reader comments on the Al-Jazeera channel news website
Impoliteness in children's interactions in a Spanish/English bilingual community of practice
Informed consent and secondary data
The Role of Digital Technology in the EndSars Protest in Nigeria During Covid-19 Pandemic
The role of prosody and gesture in the perception of mock impoliteness
Politeness
The Pragmatics of Politeness
Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show
Impoliteness in EFL
Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
Ethics as Methods
Rudeness at 911 Reconceptualizing Face and Face Attack
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |