Relative Clauses of Reason in British and American English
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6032095 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Günter Rohdenburg (Paderborn University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 288-311 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Speech (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-1283 • E-ISSN: 1527-2133 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/00031283-2848978 |
| OpenAlex | W2314803825 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 17 |
This article presents a corpus-based study of relative clauses involving the head noun reason and the competing relativizers why, that, and zero. The analyses focus on specific constellations of antecedent expressions (e.g., the reason) and subject types in the relative clause (e.g., personal pronouns). In an extensive newspaper database, American English is found to display with every single combination a lower aggregate proportion of the formally marked relativizers than British English. Additional historical explorations leave no doubt that explicit relative clause marking has lost ground over the last few centuries and that American English has been leading this development for at least 150 years. In both British and American English, and in line with the Complexity Principle, the complexity contrasts associated with different choices of antecedent expressions and relative clause subject types are shown to be matched by corresponding contrasts in terms of grammatical explicitness, with the most complex environments favoring why or that and the least complex leaning toward the zero variant
American English · Antecedent (behavioral psychology · Dependent clause · Focus (optics · Head (geology · Linguistics · Newspaper · Noun · Personal pronoun · Political science · Relative clause · Sentence · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Gender Studies in Language · History · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
More Support for ‘More’-Support
No taming the vernacular! Insights from the relatives in northern Britain
A diachronic study of relative markers in spoken and written English
Relative clauses in educated spoken English 1
Relative pronouns in time, place and manner adjuncts
On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English
Ambiguity Avoidance in English Relative Clauses
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |