Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What does America think about the Senkaku Islands? An analysis of US think tank policy and strategy positions

Bibliographic Data

ID6040428
AuthorsMio Ando (0000-0003-3397-9270, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume15
Issue3
Pages496-519
Publication date2023-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAsian Politics & Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1943-0787 • E-ISSN: 1943-0779
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/aspp.12706
OpenAlexW4385065597
LanguageEN
References cited20

This study conducts the first systematic review of major United States (US) think tank policy and strategy positions regarding defense of the Senkaku Islands. An analytical framework for content analysis is created and then applied to 76 documents spanning the 2010–2020 period. The policy orientations of 10 leading think tanks are identified, as is the strategic rationale behind their arguments. Because think tanks in the US exert tremendous influence on policymaking, the thick description conducted in this study can shed a great deal of light not only on the past but also the future scope of potential US policy options in the East China Sea

China · Period (music · Policy analysis · Political science · Politics · Scope (computer science · Think tanks · Computer Science · International Development and Aid · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Socioeconomic Development in Asia

  • Think Tanks in America

    Thomas Medvetz•Think Tanks in America•2012

  • We Must Protect This Peace with Our Hands”

    Open Access•Matthew Brummer, Eitan Oren•Journal of advanced military…•2022

  • Reexamining Threat Perception in Early Cold War Japan

    Eitan Oren, Matthew Brummer•Journal of Cold War Studies•2020

  • Japan’s evolving threat perception

    Open Access•Eitan Oren•International Relations of the…•2019

  • Think Tank Transnationalisation and Non-profit Analysis, Advice and Advocacy

    Diane Stone•Global Society•2000

  • Threat perception, government centralization, and political instrumentality in Abe Shinzo’s Japan

    Eitan Oren, Matthew Brummer•Australian Journal Of International…•2020

  • Uncharted Waters

    Mira Rapp Hooper•The Washington Quarterly•2015

  • From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing

    Christopher Layne, Christopher M Layne•International Security•1997

  • Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise

    Open Access•James G Mcgann•Perspectives on Politics•2005

  • Identity Politics and the East China Sea

    Open Access•Wrenn Yennie Lindgren, Petter Y Lindgren•Asian Politics & Policy•2017

  • American think tanks in the twenty-first century

    Open Access•Daniel W Drezner, Daniel Drezner•International Journal Canada s…•2015

  • Between the Eagle and the Dragon

    Open Access•G John Ikenberry•Political Science Quarterly•2016

  • Innovation and Alliances

    Open Access•J Schmid, Matthew Brummer et al.•Review of Policy Research•2017

  • Old world, new world

    Open Access•Donald E Abelson•International Affairs•2014

  • Understanding the Development of Think Tanks in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan

    Patrick Köllner, Xufeng Zhu et al.•Pacific Affairs•2018

  • Knowledge Regimes in Post-Developmental States

    Sebastian Maslow•Pacific Affairs•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae