Global city formation, authoritarian politics, and transnational policy transfer
The case of affordable housing in China
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6041268 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Xiaoye She (0000-0002-9966-7360, California State University, San Marcos, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 15 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 408-430 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Asian Politics & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1943-0787 • E-ISSN: 1943-0779 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aspp.12708 |
| OpenAlex | W4383868361 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 33 |
Conventional research on global cities and policy transfer focuses on global cities in developed democracies. How Asian global cities innovate and transfer social policy has received less scholarly attention. I argue that transnational policy transfer (TPT) has occurred between more mature global cities in Asia and emerging global cities in China in the post‐reform era. Empirically, this article examines the policy domain of affordable housing (AH) and identifies two mature models of AH provision: asset‐based welfare (ABW) in Singapore and public rental housing (PRH) in Hong Kong. It then traces how these models were transferred in three emerging global cities of Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen. While Shanghai has favored Singapore's ABW model, Guangzhou and Shenzhen have prioritized Hong Kong's PRH model. By selecting three cases with different political‐administrative statuses, this article shows how authoritarian politics can interact with the agency of global cities in shaping varying TPT trajectories
Agency (philosophy · Authoritarianism · China · Democracy · Economic growth · Economics · Global city · Policy transfer · Political science · Politics · Rental housing · Renting · Sociology · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Public Administration · Urban Planning and Governance
Policy Making in China
Emerging Chinese Cities
“Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”
Manoeuvring within a Fragmented Bureaucracy
Fragmented authorities, institutional misalignments, and challenges to renewable energy transition
The evolution of policy experimentation in China
Berlin and Warsaw
Inequality and the Knowledge Economy
How Singapore's Central Provident Fund Fares in Social Security and Social Policy
Welfare States as Nation States
The Role of Policy Labs in Policy Experiment and Knowledge Transfer
Global cities, glocal states
Pathways to global city formation
Multiple pathways to global city formation
Global Cities and Developmentalist States
Housing and land financialization under the state ownership of land in China
Global cities with Chinese characteristics
Chinese strategies of experimental governance. The underlying forces influencing urban restructuring in the Pearl River Delta
China's hybrid global city region pathway
State policy and the globalization of Beijing
Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer in Comparative Welfare State Research
Global Cities and Developmental States
Leading World Cities
Beyond the Third World City
What have we Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited
The Future of Policy Transfer Research
Productivist Welfare Capitalism
Understanding Governance
Understanding Process Tracing
Governing China
Welfare Regimes and Global Cities
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |