The bees are our sheep

The role of honey and fat in the transition to livestock keeping during the last two thousand years in southernmost Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID6042222
AuthorsThembi Russell (0000-0002-0241-216X, University of the Witwatersrand, corresponding author), Faye Lander (0000-0002-5122-5141, University of the Witwatersrand)
Year2015
Volume50
Issue3
Pages318-342
Publication date2015-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAzania Archaeological Research in Africa (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0067-270X • E-ISSN: 1945-5534
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0067270x.2015.1051793
OpenAlexW1897535084
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited83

In this paper we suggest a model for how some foragers may have become stock-keepers in the past. Forager beekeepers stay in one place and cultivate a storable and exchangeable product, honey. This desired product has been used by the Okiek forager beekeepers of Kenya to obtain livestock from their pastoralist/agropastoralist neighbours. We believe that amongst foragers such as these the transition to livestock-keeping would not have been as difficult as is sometimes postulated (cf. Marshall 2000; Smith 2005, 2014). We describe parallels between sheep, bees, their products and their keeping, which are informative to the debate. The difficulty for archaeologists is that the archaeology of beekeeping is largely invisible. One exception relates to evidence of interactions between foragers and bees documented in rock-paintings in the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Mountains, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Here, too, are paintings of sheep that we suggest are old and may represent how foragers thought of sheep during their first encounters with them

Archaeology · Beekeeping · Biology · Ethnology · Geography · Livestock · Parallels · Pastoralism · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Ecology · Engineering · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub