Upper Palaeolithic Installation Art
Topography, Distortion, Animation and Participation in the Production and Experience of Cantabrian Cave Art
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6044595 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Takashi Sakamoto (0000-0002-8691-9872, corresponding author), P Pettitt (0000-0002-6195-9376, Durham University), Roberto Ontañón (0000-0002-0504-3961) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 665-688 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-7743 • E-ISSN: 1474-0540 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0959774320000153 |
| OpenAlex | W3026116997 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 53 |
The physical nature of cave walls and its impact on Upper Palaeolithic image making and viewing has frequently been invoked in explanations about the function of cave art. The morphological features (convexities, concavities, cracks and ridges) are frequently incorporated into the representations of prey animals that dominate the art, and several studies have attempted to document the relationship between the cave wall and the art in a quantitative manner. One of the effects of such incorporation is that undulating walls will distort the appearance of images as viewers change their viewing position. Was this distortion deliberate or accidental? Until now, the phenomenon has not been investigated quantitatively. We address this here, analysing 54 Late Upper Palaeolithic animal images deriving from three Cantabrian caves, Covalanas, El Pendo and El Castillo. We introduce a novel use for photogrammetry and 3D modelling through documenting the morphology of these caves’ walls and establishing the specific relationship between the walls and the art created on them. Our observations suggest that Palaeolithic artists deliberately placed images on very specific topographies. The restricted nature of these choice decisions and the fact that the resulting distortions could have been avoided but were not suggest that the interaction between viewer, art and wall was integral to the way cave art functioned
Animation · Archaeology · Art · Cave · Photogrammetry · Remote sensing · Visual arts · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Computer Science · History · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology
Engraved Limestone Block from Švédův stůl Cave, Czech Republic
Scientific virtual reality as a research tool in prehistoric archaeology
Upper Palaeolithic art as a perceptual search for magical images
Illuminating palaeolithic art using virtual reality
Engineered ‘landmarks’ associated with Late Paleolithic engraved shelters
Application of Line of Sight and Potential Audience Analysis to Unravel the Spatial Organization of Palaeolithic Cave Art
The Drive to Draw
Conversations with Caves
Figure recognition and visual attention patterns behind the observation of Palaeolithic art
Drawing in the depths
Bringing science to the study of ancient senses - archaeology and visual psychology
Animals hidden in plain sight
‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry
The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers
The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion
Response to Aubert et al.'s reply ‘Early dates for ‘Neanderthal cave art’ may be wrong’ [J. Hum. Evol. 125 (2018), 215–217]
Rock art and social geography in the Upper Paleolithic. Contribution to the socio-cultural function of the Roc-aux-Sorciers rock-shelter (Angles-sur-l’Anglin, France) from the viewpoint of its sculpted frieze
The Rock Art of the Côa Valley (Portugal) and its Archaeological Context
Integration of natural stone features and conservation of the Upper Palaeolithic Côa Valley and Siega Verde open-air rock-art
New Approaches in the Search for Meaning? A Review of Research in “Paleolithic Art“
"New Approaches in the Search for Meaning? A Review of Research in "Paleolithic Art
Applications of digital photography in the study of Paleolithic cave art
Reconstructing Paleolithic cave art
Multi-image Photogrammetry for Underwater Archaeological Site Recording
Performance evaluation of a multi-image 3D reconstruction software on a low-feature artefact
Choosing rock art locations
Light, Human Evolution, and the Palaeolithic
Las pinturas rupestres paleolíticas de la cueva de Covalanas (Ramales de la Victoria, Cantabria)
Methodological contribution to the integrated study of European Palaeolithic rock art
The European Upper Palaeolithic
Orestes’ Conviction at the Assembly in Euripides’ Orestes
The Paleolithic Cave Art of Vasco‐cantabrian Spain
Cave Art
Cave Art in Context
Last Glacial Human Settlement in Eastern Cantabria (Northern Spain)
Radiocarbon AMS Dates for Paleolithic Cave Paintings
Technical Note
Seasonal variations of the Middle–Upper Paleolithic transition at El Castillo, Cueva Morı́n and El Pendo (Cantabria, Spain)
The Origins of Iconic Depictions
The Visual Dynamics of Upper Palaeolithic Cave Art
Early dates for 'Neanderthal cave art' may be wrong
Aesthetics and Rock Art
Is Palaeolithic cave art consistent with costly signalling theory? Lascaux as a test case
Animation in Palaeolithic art
From 2D to 3D at macro- and microscopic scale in rock art studies
Art, time and thought
Rites in the dark? An evaluation of the current evidence for ritual areas at Magdalenian cave sites
First Palaeolithic rock art in Germany
Expanding the horizons of Palaeolithic rock art
New views on old hands
Cave art without the caves
Shamanism, Phosphenes, and Early Art
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |