A friend indeed to friends in need? China's trade regime and Covid-19 vaccine diplomacy
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6045453 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Indra De Soysa (0000-0003-2751-4223, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Krishna Chaitanya Vadlamannati (0000-0001-5999-1126, University College Dublin, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 212-226 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | China Economic Quarterly International (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2666-9331 • E-ISSN: 2666-9331 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.001 |
| OpenAlex | W4402624454 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 21 |
Employing newly available data on Chinese Covid-19 vaccine deliveries for a cross-section of 157 countries, we examine if China's vaccine diplomacy is driven by altruistic, enlightened self-interested motives or by purely strategic motives. According to the enlightened self-interested logic, China's vaccine supply would coincide with helping countries dependent on China for trade, i.e. its trading friends, while the strategic logic would entail providing vaccines to countries important commercially to China. In other words, the gravity of the Covid situation would be leveraged by China for strategic gain. Utilizing the logit estimator on probability of receiving vaccines from China and Tobit estimator on vaccine purchases and donations, we find that developing countries that are important to China's trade, and thereby, China's own commercial interests were less likely to get vaccines compared with countries that are more dependent on China. Furthermore, we find that countries more dependent on China are also likely to receive vaccine donations rather than purchases, suggesting that vaccine diplomacy was unlikely to be for commercial and strategic gain. Our results taken together signify that vaccine deliveries by China were not manipulated by trade interests in Beijing. The results suggest instead that China supplied vaccines to countries needing them and with whom Chinese goodwill reflects a more normal course of diplomacy—to service friends in need
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Biology · China · Diplomacy · Economics · International trade · Political science · Politics · Global Health and Epidemiology · HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses · International Development and Aid · Law · Medicine · Virology
Aid, China, and Growth
An introduction to ROC analysis
Health Diplomacy and the Enduring Relevance of Foreign Policy Interests
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA
Understanding how and why health is integrated into foreign policy - a case study of health is global, a UK Government Strategy 2008–2013
Humanitarian diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific
Coronavirus diplomacy
Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
Let's Put Garbage-Can Regressions and Garbage-Can Probits Where They Belong
Is Good Governance Rewarded? A Cross-national Analysis of Debt Forgiveness
Back to the Future
Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest
Soft Power
Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid
Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis
The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |