Reforming the World Health Organization

What influence do the BRICS wield

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6049703
AutoresLara Gautier (0000-0002-9515-295X, Bocconi University), Andrew Harmer (0000-0003-3025-9454, University of Edinburgh, autor de correspondencia), Fabrizio Tediosi (0000-0001-8671-9400, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute), Eduardo Missoni (0000-0003-2296-4145, Bocconi University)
Año2014
Volumen20
Número2
Páginas163-181
Fecha de publicación2014-04-03
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaContemporary Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1356-9775 • E-ISSN: 1469-3631
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13569775.2014.907987
OpenAlexW1991749710
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas10
Referencias citadas17

The World Health Organization (WHO) is currently undergoing fundamental reform that is intended to impact its programmes and priority setting and its financial and governing structures. Within the reform debates, new relations of powers are emerging among traditional donors and emerging economies such as the 'BRICS': Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. These five emerging economies have formally committed 'to strengthen and legitimise the WHO as the coordinating authority in global health' through the principle of multilateralism. In this paper, the results of a qualitative study – based on 21 key informant interviews – that seeks to better understand BRICS' engagement in this organisation and the extent to which their action enables these countries to influence the reform process were presented. The results show that individual BRICS countries found natural pairings with each other on both particular elements of the reform, notably governance and WHO financing, and specific health issues. While numerous examples of individual BRICS countries seeking to raise the profile of specific health issues were found, some evidence of a coordinated effort to influence reform as a bloc was also found. Although this was largely limited to rhetorical announcements of support in formal Declarations and Communiqués, it nevertheless articulates a vision of the WHO as an organisation with a broad mandate delivered with sufficient, predictable funding

China · Corporate governance · Economic growth · Economics · Emerging markets · Global governance · Global health · Health care · Mandate · Multilateralism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Sociology · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses · International Development and Aid · Law · Public Administration · Finance