Uncooperative leadership

US public opinion and limited commitments to region building

Bibliographic Data

ID6050190
AuthorsGaspare M Genna (0000-0002-1228-5301, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA), P J Vierra (The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA)
Year2024
Volume30
Issue5
Pages618-638
Publication date2024-10-19
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-9775 • E-ISSN: 1469-3631
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13569775.2024.2307101
OpenAlexW4391300400
LanguageEN
References cited29

Some research indicates that regional integration is more likely when power asymmetry exists among neighbouring states. Theoretically, preponderant powers can act as regional leaders because they can promote the development of collective goods that will entice others into partnerships. Other scholars argue that power asymmetry is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for integration. The preponderant power is to be willing to lead efforts. We argue that the US cannot lead North American regional integration when the voting public consumes negative messages concerning its least developed partner, Mexico. Negative portrayals of Mexico, whether justified or not, lower US public support and contribute to limiting the US political capacity to foster region building. The data analysis of a national representative sample (N = 1,133) using an online survey experiment confirms our hypotheses while controlling for various demographic factors and candidate support during the 2016 party election primaries

Opinion leadership · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Public relations · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics

Tools

Open DOI