La théorie des opportunités et l’erreur de généralisation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6051322 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Felson (0000-0003-3173-072X, Université de Montréal, corresponding author), Jan J M Van Dijk |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 29-36 |
| Publication date | 2005-08-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Criminologie (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0316-0041 • E-ISSN: 1492-1367 |
| Publisher | Consortium Erudit (PUBLISHER • CA) |
| DOI | 10.7202/017337ar |
| OpenAlex | W2100823241 |
| Language | FR |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 6 |
Crime relationships are often inconsistent at different levels of aggregation for good theoretical reasons. That is why we should avoid committing the fallacy of composition, namely, drawing inferences between individuals and aggregates or from one level of aggregation to another. The routine activity approach becomes part of the solution
Epistemology · Fallacy · Humanities · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Mathematics · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2001 - 2001 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |