A Reluctant Revenge? The Poetry ofDe Eenzame Uitvaart
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6055637 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bram Lambrecht (0000-0003-2188-6560, KU Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 65-79 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dutch Crossing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-6564 • E-ISSN: 1759-7854 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03096564.2020.1729564 |
| OpenAlex | W3008457226 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
The Dutch-Flemish literary project De eenzame uitvaart (The lonely funeral) consists of city-based groups of poets who write poems and perform them at funerals of fellow citizens who died lonely and often anonymously. At first sight, this project could be considered as a revival of the genre of occasional poetry and, more generally, as an exponent of the 'revenge' of the lyric in the twenty-first century. This revenge, a term borrowed from Thomas Vaessens, implies that contemporary poetry no longer functions as a marginal and elitist genre but has reconquered its popular status and societal value - in short, its heteronomous function. This paper aims to question this idea of the lyric's revenge by analysing the ambitions (as expressed by the initiators of the project) and a selection of poems of De eenzame uitvaart. It contends that the project is founded on a firm belief in the potency of the lyric and its specific language but that this belief is often contradicted by the hesitant rhetoric of the actual poems. This discrepancy between great ambitions and hesitant practice is interpreted as a symptom of the contemporary status of the lyric, which takes revenge yet only reluctantly
Art · Flemish · Function (biology · Linguistics · Literature · Poetry · Rhetoric · Selection (genetic algorithm · Sociology · Value (mathematics · French Literature and Poetry · History · Literature, Politics, and Exile Studies · Philosophy · Poetry Analysis and Criticism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|