Anthropocentrism in the Anthropocene

Bibliographic Data

ID6057126
AuthorsKristoffer Balslev Willert (0009-0004-5919-9920, Climate Central, corresponding author), Nicolai Knudsen (Aarhus University)
Year2025
Volume17
Issue3
Pages638-656
Publication date2025-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Humanities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2201-1919 • E-ISSN: 2201-1919
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/22011919-11956643
OpenAlexW7106507954
LanguageEN
References cited18

The idea that we must move beyond anthropocentrism to overcome interspecies injustice and environmental collapse is widespread in the environmental humanities. Yet the concept of anthropocentrism remains ambiguous and so do some of the arguments raised against it. What exactly should we move beyond and why? The article attempts to answer these questions and clarify the merits and limitations of both anthropocentric and post-anthropocentric views in ethics and ontology. This article proposes that although some implausible and morally problematic forms of anthropocentrism should be denounced, there are other ways we must remain anthropocentric. The article disambiguates the concept of anthropocentrism and assesses the key arguments against it, then outlines a minimal form of anthropocentrism that we call ostensive humanism. Ostensive humanism is compatible with many post-anthropocentric ideas but suggests that the ethical and political project aimed at ending interspecies injustice and the climate crisis inevitably points to human beings as its moral addressees

Anthropocene · Anthropocentrism · Climate justice · Humanism · Injustice · Politics

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access