Environmental impact bonds as a transformative policy innovation
Frames and frictions in the construction process of the Nutrient-EIB
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6057940 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Olli Tiikkainen (0000-0002-8799-8699), Matti Pihlajamaa (0000-0002-6656-1906), Maria Åkerman (0000-0001-6895-3375) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Pages | 170-182 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2210-4224 • E-ISSN: 2210-4232 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eist.2022.10.006 |
| OpenAlex | W4308345464 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 55 |
Impact bonds have emerged as a policy innovation with the potential to change public policies towards being more outcome-based and pre-emptive – and more effective in answering sustainability challenges. This financial instrument has been used for social problems and only recently for environmental issues. One example is the Nutrient-EIB (environmental impact bond) which is in preparation to be implemented in Southwest Finland. We study involved stakeholders’ framings of the Nutrient-EIB's potential for solving problems of eutrophication of the Baltic Sea and the lock-in situation of recycled fertiliser development. Based on stakeholder interviews, we identify three interpretative frames: applying the impact investing logic, challenging agri-environmental policy, and extending experimental policy-making. We recognise frictions between the frames regarding the required knowledge base and scale. We discuss how visions of transformative outcomes may challenge each other and what kinds of barriers transformative policy innovations may face
Business · Economics · Environmental resource management · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Transformative learning · Vision · Community Development and Social Impact · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Ecology
A Picture of the Frame
Experiments in climate governance – A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions
The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways
Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation
Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions
Transformative Environmental Governance
Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change
Transformative innovation policy
Sustainability transitions
Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions
The qualitative content analysis process
Transformative innovation policy
The sustainable development index
Narratives of Promise, Narratives of Caution
Of Principle and Principal
Accountability of Environmental Impact Bonds
Sustainability experiments in Asia
On the study and practice of regional innovation policy
Policy innovation in a changing climate
Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance
Material politics in the circular economy
Experimentalist governance
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
Closing the green finance gap – A systems perspective
Pluralising progress
Technological innovation systems in contexts
Conceptualising the systemic activities of intermediaries in sustainability transitions
Passing the baton
Conceptualizing market formation for transformative policy
Exploring the possibilities for deliberately cultivating more effective ecologies of intermediation
Too risky – The role of finance as a driver of sustainability transitions
Relating financial systems to sustainability transitions
Strengthen finance in sustainability transitions research
Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis
Climate policy innovation
Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation
On the transformation of children at-risk into an investment proposition
Theory Construction in Qualitative Research
The organization of markets for collective concerns and their failures
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |