Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Increasing diversity through goal-setting in corporate social responsibility reporting

Bibliographic Data

ID6058583
AuthorsLaura Motel (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume35
Issue5/6
Pages328-349
Publication date2016-06-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEqual Opportunities International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-7093 • E-ISSN: 2040-7149
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/edi-01-2016-0005
OpenAlexW2548054840
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited48

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effect of goal-setting theory in remediating workplace demographic representation inequality. Design/methodology/approach This study evaluates the effect of goal-setting theory in Fortune 100 companies’ corporate social reporting (CSR) on year-over-prior change in diversity representation using t -tests and independent, repeated measures ANOVA. Findings Reporting companies significantly outperformed the population in minority and female leadership increases. Companies using specific goals and relevant feedback facilitated better outcomes for minority and female leaders, respectively. Research limitations/implications Dichotomous coding was employed. Qualitative coding over multiple years is suggested for future research. CSR reporting is voluntary, unaudited, and inconsistent. Comparing outcomes for organizations with mandatory reporting or diversity quotas would provide interesting future comparatives. Despite the limitations, this research demonstrates the benefits of goal-setting theory on social outcomes. Practical implications Companies transparently publishing goals, feedback, and metrics lead the way to multicultural environments. Additionally, investors use social responsibility in investment decision making. The Securities and Exchange Commission should incorporate non-financial requirements into existent reporting subject to audit, consistent presentation, and public availability. Organizations should disclose diversity goals and outcomes whether the company aspires to genuinely promote greater representation or avoid greater regulation. Reporting transparency and articulation of specific, measureable goals and feedback are encouraged for non-financial metrics. Originality/value Significant research investigates why inequality exists in organizations yet little addresses how to reduce the problem. Pioneer studies in applying goal-setting to diversity show promise. Research exploring the dark side of goal-setting is rapidly emerging. This research pursues the “light side” of goal-setting to evaluate use on social business issues, specifically, increasing diverse representation

Audit · Business · Corporate social responsibility · Originality · Political science · Population · Public relations · Sociology · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology · Social Psychology · Accounting

  • Indigenous player inclusion in the Australian Football League

    Open Access•Justine Ferrer, Paul Turner•Equal Opportunities International•2017

  • A representative organizational diversity metric

    Open Access•E Holly Buttner, William Latimer Tullar•Equal Opportunities International•2018

  • Diverse perspectives on inclusion

    Open Access•Sarah Singletary Walker, Enrica N Ruggs et al.•Equal Opportunities International•2019

  • Goals Gone Wild

    Lisa D Ordóñez, Maurice E Schweitzer et al.•Academy of Management Perspectives•2009

  • Institutional Racism

    Ian F Haney López•The Yale Law Journal•2000

  • New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory

    Open Access•Edwin A Locke, Gary P Latham•Current Directions in Psychological…•2006

  • Diversity Management

    Open Access•Jacqueline A Gilbert, Bette Ann Stead et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•1999

  • Organizational and Personal Dimensions in Diversity Climate

    Open Access•Michàl E Mor Barak, Michal Barák et al.•The Journal of Applied Behavioral…•1998

  • Goal Setting and Negotiation Performance

    Open Access•Deborah C Zetik, Alice F Stuhlmacher•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2002

  • Leader self‐awareness

    Open Access•Rachel E Sturm, Scott N Taylor et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2013

  • On Motivated Role Selection

    Open Access•Clifford Evans, Clifford D Evans et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2009

  • Adolescents' Conceptualization of Adult Roles

    Open Access•Dorothy W Jackson, Jenn‐yun Tein et al.•Sex Roles•1998

  • Dismantling institutional racism

    Open Access•Derek M Griffith, Mondi Mason et al.•American Journal of Community…•2007

  • Organizational culture

    Edgar H Schein•American Psychologist•1990

  • Rage against the Iron Cage

    Open Access•Frank Dobbins, Frank Dobbin et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies

    Open Access•A Kalev, Frank Dobbins et al.•American Sociological Review•2006

  • Goal setting and task performance

    Edwin A Locke, Karyll N Shaw et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1981

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2017 - 2019 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae