Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Shadows and lights

Disabled Workers’ Use of Digital Technologies in the Workplace

Bibliographic Data

ID6058766
AuthorsRim Hachana (0000-0002-6055-1432, Université catholique de lyon, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume44
Issue8
Pages1066-1081
Publication date2025-11-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEqual Opportunities International (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1758-7093 • E-ISSN: 2040-7149
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/edi-06-2024-0246
OpenAlexW4403748891
LanguageEN
References cited20

Purpose In this research, we apply a sociological lens to reconstruct the perspectives of disabled workers in their use of digital technologies within the organizational setting. Our study has two objectives. First, we aim to investigate how disabled workers use digital technologies to enact socially valued roles, thereby helping to counteract internalized societal norms through enhancing workplace inclusion. Second, we seek to explain under which conditions disabled workers can better approach the digital imperatives in the workplace. Design/methodology/approach This research has a qualitative research design, employing the thematic-content analysis method. We conducted one-to-one interviews with 33 disabled workers in various positions who used a variety of digital technologies in their work. Findings Our findings outline how the digital environment in the workplace creates a distinct set of rules and expectations that disabled workers must navigate. These rules reflect the structures and practices inherent in digital technologies (logic of practice), which either empower or constrain disabled workers based on their habitus and the ability to leverage various forms of capital. This study discusses how some disabled workers who have greater access to cultural capital (such as digital skills) are better positioned to navigate the digital environment, whereas those with limited access to such capital face additional challenges. It explained how symbolic violence arises in the experiences of some disabled workers by revealing how the implicit rules of the digital workplace reinforce power dynamics that marginalize them, thereby perpetuating social domination. Originality/value In examining the ambivalent role of digital technologies for disabled workers, this research navigates the complex interplay between empowerment and barriers within the digital workplace. Drawing on Bourdieu’s theory of practice, this study explains how the enactment of digital technologies can enhance the sociability and inclusion of disabled workers. Thanks to his concepts of habitus, forms of capital, field, illusion and symbolic violence, we highlight the disruptions that can emerge in reconciling disability with digital requirements. Moreover, the study makes pivotal contributions to the discourse on diversity, inclusion and equality. It underscores the empowerment aspect, wherein digital technologies serve as critical enablers for communication, productivity and independence for disabled workers and critically evaluates the persistent barriers to digital inclusivity

Business · Occupational safety and health · Political science · Workplace safety · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Retirement, Disability, and Employment

  • Sociomaterial Practices

    Open Access•Wanda J Orlikowski•Organization Studies•2007

  • Disability, fairness, and algorithmic bias in AI recruitment

    Open Access•Nicholas Tilmes•Ethics and Information Technology•2022

  • Turning disability into a business

    Open Access•Eline Jammaers, Jannine Williams•Organization•2023

  • The Logic of Practice

    Pierre Bourdieu•The Logic of Practice•1990

  • Le champ économique

    Pierre Bourdieu•Actes de la recherche en sciences…•1997

  • Unequal access

    Open Access•Kevin S Y Tan, Calvin M L Chan•Journal of Aging Studies•2018

  • Cautionary Notes on Navigating the Neurocognitive Turn

    Open Access•Victoria Pitts-Taylor, Victoria Pitts‐Taylor•Sociological Forum•2014

  • Drivers of career success among the visually impaired

    Open Access•A Uday Bhaskar, Yehuda Baruch et al.•Human Relations•2023

  • Humanizing work in the digital age

    Open Access•Deryn Guest, Angela Knox et al.•Human Relations•2022

  • Conceptualizing disability accommodation device acceptance by workgroups through a sociomaterial lens

    Open Access•Madhur Kulkarni, Mukta Kulkarni et al.•Equal Opportunities International•2023

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

  • Reproduction culturelle et reproduction sociale

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Social Science Information•1971

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae